Short Week

I need some assist on this question 

NURSING

Student Instructions for i-Human Virtual Simulation

NR325/NR330 Maggie Naganashe Scenario 2

PURPOSE:

The following information is to be used in guiding your preparation and participation in the virtual simulation scenario for this course. This document will provide applicable course outcomes in preparation for your simulation.

SCENARIO OVERVIEW:

Maggie Naganashe is a 62-year-old American Indian female with chronic renal failure. She also has a 15-year history of type II diabetes mellitus and a history of hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. She lives on an American Indian reservation and is a proud member of the Odawa tribe. Mrs. Naganashe reports that she was unable to go to her dialysis treatment this week because her husband had to use their only car for a job interview. She was admitted for shortness of breath, swelling, weight gain and fatigue.

LEARNER OBJECTIVES:

1. Utilize clinical reasoning skills to perform a health history and physical assessment on an adult patient. (CO 1, 2, 3, 4)

2. Construct a plan of care based by prioritizing assessment findings and nursing diagnoses (CO 4, 5, 6, 7)

3. Evaluate patient outcomes to determine the effectiveness of nursing interventions and need for ongoing care (CO 4, 8)

4. Communicate and collaborate with the patient, family, and interdisciplinary healthcare team members (CO 3, 6)

STUDENT ROLES DURING SIMULATION:

You are the staff nurse at the hospital who will be conducting a comprehensive assessment. After completing your assessment, you are expected to document your findings as a nurse’s note in SBAR format.

KEY FEATURES OF i-HUMAN:

· As the nurse, you are expected to complete the case scenario using the following tabs: EHR, History, Physical, Analyze, Actions, Nursing Notes, Summary

· There are required questions and/or additional information provided related to this case. The questions, information, and videos must be completed/reviewed prior to progressing to the next tab.

· Nursing Notes: At the end of the simulation, you will document your assessment findings using ISBAR.

CONFIDENTIALITY:

To preserve the educational value, integrity, and safety of the learning environment, you agree to maintain strict confidentiality about the proceedings of the simulation session, details of the training scenarios and the performance of all participants. You acknowledge that this expectation aligns with the guidelines related to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) as well as laws governing Protected Health Information (PHI) in client care environments.  You will not view, discuss, share, record or disclose any confidential information pertaining to the session. You understand that lapses in confidentiality are considered academic misconduct and could result in dismissal from the academic program. 


FICTION AGREEMENT:

You will suspend judgment of realism for any given simulation in exchange for the promise of learning new knowledge and skills, treating the simulated patients with the same care due an actual patient, act with a genuine desire to learn even when it may be difficult to do so.  

DUE DATE:

The virtual simulation is assigned to be completed during

Week 4
prior to your scheduled debriefing with faculty/peers.

SIMULATION TIMING:

· Pre-simulation preparation: 30-60 minutes

· Pre-brief: 15 minutes

· Run Time: 2.75 hours

· Debriefing: 60 minutes

ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION

Faculty will utilize your participation measurements in the i-Human case, and debriefing discussions to identify areas of opportunity for enhancement of your clinical growth. Your experiences in i-Human will contribute to your overall completion of clinical requirements for the course as documented on the Clinical Learning Evaluation tool.

i-Human Evaluation – What does my total score mean?


REVIEW AND COMPLETE PRIOR TO THE START OF THE VIRTUAL SIMULATION:

In order to prepare for the simulation, you are
required to complete the pre-simulation questions below and submit this prework to the faculty via uploading your responses in Canvas prior to the start of the virtual simulation. If you do not complete the pre-simulation questions and upload them, you will

not
be able to access or participate in the simulation.

1. Describe the fluid and electrolyte imbalance that occur with chronic renal failure.

2. What are key patient education concepts related to chronic kidney disease?

3. Explore the CDC Tribal Data, Information, and Resources at
www.cdc.gov/tribal/data-resources and read the following article.

Mitchell, F. (2012). Reframing diabetes in American Indian communities: A social determinants of health perspective.
Health & Social Work, 37(2):71–79.

[Note: This article can be located through the Chamberlain University Library.]

4. Describe risk factors and conditions that lead to health disparities for American Indians.

Immediately following the completion of the virtual simulation, you will complete the evaluation of the simulation using the link provided.

©2023 Chamberlain University LLC. All rights reserved.

Chamberlain University | National Management Offices | 500 W. Monroe St., Suite 1300 | Chicago, IL 60661

image1.png

image2.jpg

evaluate your intervention. preventing homelessnees in veteran population

Develop a 4-6 page plan that will allow you to evaluate your intervention.

You will also be required to submit your completed practicum hours using CORE ELMS. You must submit a minimum of 20 confirmed hours with each assessment deliverable to receive a grade for the entire assessment.

Introduction

Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.

Once an intervention is planned and implemented it is important to evaluate the degree to which the outcomes of the project were achieved. By evaluating the desired outcomes of an intervention, it is possible to make more informed decisions about opportunities for continuous improvement. It is also possible to identify strategies and approaches that could be useful in improving one’s personal practice in other contexts or care areas.

Preparations

  • Read Guiding Questions: Evaluation Plan Design [DOC]. This document is designed to give you questions to consider and additional guidance to help you successfully complete this assessment.
  • As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.
    • What specific piece or pieces of technology did you propose using in your implementation plan?
    • How did the type of technology you chose impact the development of your implementation plan?
    • How will the incorporation of the technology you propose make your implementation plan more successful?

Instructions

Note: The assessments in this course are sequenced in such a way as to help you build specific skills that you will use throughout your program. Complete the assessments in the order in which they are presented.

Your evaluation plan design will be the forth section of your final project submission. The goal for this is to finalize the outcomes that your plan is seeking to achieve and to create a plan to evaluate the degree to which those outcomes would have been achieved if your intervention plan has been implemented. This will allow you to determine the degree to which the plan was successful in addressing the identified need of your target population and setting.

You will also discuss ways in which your role allows you to lead change and drive quality improvement, and to potentially improve the project in the future. In addition, you will reflect on how the project will leave you better prepared for success in other aspects of your current and future career. Provide enough detail so that the faculty member assessing your implementation plan design and discussion will be able to provide substantive feedback that you will be able to incorporate into the final draft of your project.

At minimum, be sure to address the bullet points below, as they correspond to the grading criteria. You may also want to read the scoring guide and the Guiding Questions: Evaluation Plan Design [DOC] document to better understand how each criterion will be assessed. In addition to the bullet points below, provide a brief introduction that refreshes the reader’s memory about your problem statement, your planned intervention, and how you intended to implement your intervention (this should only be a single paragraph).

Reminder: These instructions are an outline. Your heading for this this section should be Evaluation of Plan and not Part 1: Evaluation of Plan.

Part 1: Evaluation of Plan
  • Define the outcomes that are the goal of an intervention plan.
  • Create an evaluation plan to determine the impact of an intervention for a health promotion, quality improvement, prevention, education, or management need.
Part 2: Discussion

Advocacy

  • Analyze the nurse’s role in leading change and driving improvements in the quality and experience of care.
  • Explain how the intervention plan affects nursing and interprofessional collaboration, and how the health care field gains from the plan.

Future Steps

  • Explain how the current project could be improved upon to create a bigger impact in the target population as well as to take advantage of emerging technology and care models to improve outcomes and safety.

Reflection on Leading Change and Improvement

  • Reflect on how the project has impacted your ability to lead change in personal practice and future leadership positions.
  • Reflect on the ways in which the completed intervention, implementation, and evaluation plans can be transferred into your personal practice to drive quality improvement in other contexts.
Address Generally Throughout
  • Integrate resources from diverse sources that illustrate support for all aspects of an evaluation plan for an intervention, as well as for professional discussion about the plan.
  • Communicate evaluation plan and discussion of the project in a professional way that helps the audience to understand how the outcomes will be evaluated, as well as what was learned through the project process.

Organizational Structures: Functional, Service Line, Matrix, & Flat

 

Goal: To analyze the four types of Organizational Structures.

Content Requirements:

  1. Identify and describe each type of organizational structure (functional, service line, matrix and flat)
  2. Create an organizational chart for each organizational structure discussed above and describe which one applies to the clinical site or your work environment.
  3. Develop simple mission statements that could be supported by each type of structure and present a rationale for their selection of the type of structure.

Submission Instructions:

  • is to be clear and concise, and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.
  •  is to be 3 – 4 pages in length, excluding the title, and references page.
  • Incorporate a minimum of 2 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
  • Journal articles and books should be referenced according to current APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).
  •  should be formatted per current APA and references should be current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions)

Simulation

Please complete all 6 simulation opportunities and upon completion upload the certificate with answered questions for grading purposes.

Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

Weekly Essay/Writing Assignment Content

1.

Top of Form

This week's writing assignment will consist of the following: 

1. Explore the CMS Hospital Compare website (

www.medicare.gov/hospitalcompare/search.html
) and compare two hospitals in your area.

When you are finished respond in at least 3 pages [not counting cover page and references] to the following questions:

2. Based on the information presented, do you believe the findings to be accurate, or are there likely other intervening considerations?

3. Develop a 
conceptual model that explains part, or all, of one of the reported outcomes. What structures and processes could be measured to explain differences in the outcome?

Here are some great resources to develop your conceptual model:

Bottom of Form

https://youtu.be/9xf8qK8vENM

A diagram of a framework  Description automatically generated

image1.jpeg

Discussion

Discussion

Purpose

The purpose of this discussion is to discuss organizational changes and ethical-legal influences in a clinical scenario at an out-patient family practice. Students will explore potential effects on patient outcomes and ethical and legal implications for members of the heath care team as a result of illegal behaviors.  Students will develop strategies that result in prevention of untoward outcomes that result in a positive practice culture. 

Preparing the Discussion

You are a family nurse practitioner employed in a busy primary care office. The providers in the group include one physician and three nurse practitioners. The back office staff includes eight medical assistants who assist with patient care as well as filing, answering calls from patients, processing laboratory results and taking prescription renewal requests from patients and pharmacies. Stephanie, a medical assistant, has worked in the practice for 10 years and is very proficient at her job. She knows almost every patient in the practice, and has an excellent rapport with all of the providers. 

Mrs. Smith was seen today in the office for an annual physical. Her last appointment was a year ago for the same reason. During this visit, Mrs. Smith brought an empty bottle of amoxicillin with her and asked if she could have a refill. You noted the patient's name on the label, and the date on the bottle was 1 week ago. You also noted your name printed on the label as the prescriber. The patient admitted that she called last week concerned about her cough and spoke to Stephanie. You do not recall having discussed this patient with Stephanie nor do the other providers in the practice. 

Case Study Questions: 

1. What are the potential ethical and legal implications for each of the following practice members? 

· Medical assistant

· Nurse Practitioner

· Medical Director

· Practice

2. What strategies would you implement to prevent further episodes of potentially illegal behavior? 

3. What leadership qualities would you apply to effect a positive change in the practice?  Be thinking about the culture of the practice.

4. A scholarly resource must be used for EACH discussion question each week.

Reflection 2

  

One of  the key points of learning from experience is to reflect on what you  did. Reflect on the selection of your topic and question. Answer the  following questions in a document of between 250 and 500 words. Save  your response as a word document and include a 7th edition APA cover  page. Upload the document to complete the assignment. Do not cut and  paste from any document of quote from any source. This is a reflection  on your own experiences, so you should not need to do this.

A. What options do you have for finding literature?

B. How can you judge which literature is most credible?

C. Is your literature search complete? Yes my article search is complete as it has been approved by the Pamela Wright.

Strategic Planning

Preparation

The feedback you received on your care setting environmental analysis has been positive. Consequently, you have been asked to select one of the potential improvement projects you noted in your analysis and create a full, 5–10-year strategic plan to achieve the desired quality and safety improvement outcomes. You will develop your strategic plan, using either an AI approach (addressing the design stage), or by building on your SWOT analysis and applying a strategic planning model of your choice.

How you structure your plan should be based on whether you are taking an appreciative inquiry approach or using a specific strategic planning model. Regardless of the approach you choose, the requester of the plan has asked that you address the key points outlined below in the strategic plan requirements. In addition, your plan should be 6–8 pages in length.

As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.

Strategic planning models aid in setting goals, establishing time frames, and forging a path toward achieving those goals. Consider the strategic planning models you are familiar with:

  • Which model would you choose to create goals and outcomes that could address the area of concern you identified in your Assessment 1 SWOT analysis?
  • Why is this model the best choice among alternatives?
  • How does goal setting through appreciative inquiry provocative propositions differ from goal setting in the strategic planning model you selected?

 Strategic Plan

  • Develop strategic goal statements and outcomes that reflect specific quality and safety improvements for your care setting. You should have at least one short-term goal (just-in-time to one year) and one long-term goal (five years or longer).
    • Determine realistic timelines for achieving your goals.
    • Explain how your short-term goals support your long-term goals.

Note: For plans based on an AI approach, the goal statements and outcomes are provocative propositions that may be refinements of the positive, yet attainable, goals that you proposed during the dream phase of your inquiry. For plans based on a SWOT analysis, the goal statements and outcomes are specific, measurable, and applicable to the area of concern in your analysis for which you proposed pursuing improvements.

  • Justify the relevance of your proposed strategic goals and outcomes in relation to the mission, vision, and values of your care setting.
  • Analyze the extent to which your strategic goals and outcomes, and your approach to achieving them, address:
    • The ethical environment.
    • The cultural environment.
    • The use of technology.
    • Applicable health care policies, laws, and regulations.
  • Explain, in general, how you will use relevant leadership and health care theories to help achieve your proposed strategic goals and outcomes.
    • Consider whether different theories are more applicable to the short-term or long-term goals of your strategic plan.
  • Evaluate the leadership qualities and skills that are most important to successfully implementing your proposed plan and sustaining strategic direction.
    • Identify those leadership qualities and skills that are essential to achieving your goals and outcomes and sustaining strategic direction.
    • Identify those leadership qualities and skills that will have the greatest effect on the success of your plan.

discussion 11

 Bullying prevention is a growing research field that investigates the complexities and consequences of bullying. There is also a complex relationship between bullying and suicide. 

Visit http://www.stopbullying.gov/resources/inde x.html and identify resources for preventing bullying and assisting children who have been bullied. Instructions:

Post your discussion to the Moodle Discussion Forum. Word limit 500 words. Support your answers with the literature and provide citations and references in APA, 7th ed. format with shcolarly references no older than 5 years