RAC part 2, 15 questions

 

Your assigned article for critique is

Avsar, P., Budri, A., Patton, D., Walsh, S., & Moore, Z. (2022).  Developing algorithm based on activity and mobility for pressure ulcer  risk among older adult residents: Implications for evidence‐based  practice. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 19, 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12545

This is article

 

  If you haven’t already, print the RAC  #2 questions and the article.  Open your book to chapter 9, 10, or 11  and place it on your left, put the RAC 2 questions in the middle of your  desk, and put the article on your right. 

  • You’ll need your book for the questions that specifically refer to Grove and Gray 2019 in the question stem and  to look up key words in the question stem that you don’t remember from  your reading, like sampling method, power analysis, and acceptance rate.
  • The content for the article-specific RAC questions this week will be  found in the Methods, Results, and Discussion sections of the article.
  • This is a book Understanding nursing research  Grove, S., & Gray, J. (2019). Understanding nursing research (7th ed). Elsevier. 

RESPONSE TO DISCUSSION BOARD 5

Use the attached document to provide responses to the discussion board. please provide 2 scientific references in APA format.

WEEK 9 MSN 5550

 Compare and contrast the growth and developmental patterns of two toddlers of different ages using Gordon’s functional health patterns. Describe and apply the components of Gordon’s functional health patterns as it applies to toddlers.   

  Word limit 500 words  

Please make sure to provide citations and references (in APA, 7th ed. format) for your work.  

thorectical clinical Advanced Pathophysiology

Sample Outline for Concept Analysis Paper

See chapter 3 in McEwen and Wills. Use the method by Walker and Avant Box 3-1 ( p 60

I. Title Page: Select one of the following topics

a.
Advanced Practice Competency: A Concept Analysis

b.
Diversity in Nursing: A Concept Analysis

c.
Social Determinants of Health: A Concept Analysis

Format Outline(s)

II. Introduction (
Using Walker and Avant)

a. What is the concept selected-state and define the terms

b. Aims or purposes of this analysis-why are you doing the analysis?

c. Discuss all possible uses of the concept briefly-how is the concept used in different contexts, examples and then how are you using it for this paper

d. Determine the defining attributes-regardless of where it exists, what are the common identifiers that the person has this characteristic

e. Identify a model case-Use the attributes you’ve identified and highlight them in a case. A case that is hypothetical, from a text, or that you have experienced in practice.

f. Identify a borderline case and contrary case-what is a case that is something like the model case, but misses some attributes

g. Identify antecedents and consequences-what happens before the concept instance is identified; what happens as a result of acquiring it?

h. Define empirical referents- how do you know that what you are seeing is really it? How would you measure it? Or know that you are reserving it?

week5 Proposed Intervention

 

What are the decisions you made in designing your proposed intervention? Include any ethical considerations or issues you felt were relevant, the setting in which the intervention will occur, the interventions that were selected and why, and how you plan to implement the intervention.

Cite any sources in APA format.

 

Step 5: Develop a Plan for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Your Intervention
Objective: To develop a method to determine if your Intervention achieved your goals.
For each goal, create an evaluation plan including:
 Change Team member responsible for data collection, analysis, and presentation
 A measure and target ranges for the measure.
 Study design (usually pre- and post-intervention study)
 Sample (study group) or data source with comparison group
 Methods for data collection, analysis, interpretation, and presentation.
 Timelines for baseline and for post-intervention data collection and analysis
 Resources required
Step 6: Develop an Implementation Plan
Objective: Part A: To develop a plan for training or educating your staff/patients to successfully
implement your intervention.
Part B: To develop a plan for putting your intervention into place.
Part A: Develop a Plan for Staff and/or Patient Training
 Identify your Instructors, trainee audience(s) and their specific training requirements.
Determine who needs to be trained on what knowledge/skills and by when in order to achieve
your aims.
Part B: Develop an Implementation Plan for the Intervention
 Ensure you have collected all baseline data before implementing the intervention.
 Identify the person(s) responsible for implementation.
 Determine how you will implement your intervention in order to achieve your aims.
 Identify who will use what team strategies and tools, when and where.
 Create an implementation timeline.

Types of Shock

It is very important to differentiate between the different types of shock since treatment may depend on this. Complete the Comparison Table on the different types of shock. 

critical thinking

Module 01 Content

1.

Top of Form

Read the following articles:

·

Censoring Student Newspapers: An Overview

·

Student Newspapers Are Part of a Curriculum, Not Forums for Free Speech

·

School Administrators Have No Right to Censor Student Newspapers

Choose either of the two following arguments:

School newspapers should be subject to censorship by faculty and/or school officials.

Or

School newspapers should have full First Amendment freedoms.

Compose a short (1-2 page) essay addressing your chosen argument.

· Use any information you find valid to support your side.

· Use
evidence and
reason to support your argument.

· Avoid emotional appeals as much as possible.

Write your essay in a Word document. Be sure to proofread for grammar and spelling. Include at least two sources in addition to those provided above. Add your sources in APA formatting on a separate page.

Bottom of Form

Family Genetic History

Assistance please

sociology discussion 4

 

Respond to two (2) of the following prompts:

  1. How has U.S. society’s understanding of race and ethnicity evolved over time? Why do the cultural explanations for race and ethnicity exceed the biological ones? What impact does constantly evolving terminology related to race and ethnicity have on racial and ethnic relations in the U.S.? (USLO 4.1)
  2. Explore and identify your community’s racial and ethnic demographics. What are some of the racial and ethnic conversations taking place in your community? How would you rate intergroup interactions among members of your community on a scale of tolerant to intolerant? Consider if notions like pluralism, amalgamation, expulsion, and genocide apply to your community. (USLO 4.2, 4.3)
  3. Compare and contrast the strengths and limitations of the theoretical perspectives on race and ethnicity. Is it beneficial to have several theoretical viewpoints on race and ethnicity, or should we focus on developing a single theory to study racism and ethnic oppression? Which theory do you find most compelling and likely to promote social justice? (USLO 4.4)

discussion 1 pharm

 

A 23-year-old biracial (Black Asian) female arrives at the clinic for an evaluation. She has lost 30 pounds in 6 weeks without trying. She complains of feelings of guilt about her symptoms and everyday sadness that does not go away.  She also states she is not able to stay asleep and has difficulty concentrating.  Her family is Jamaican and has used herbal teas, not a psychiatrist in the past to treat these symptoms.

  • Discuss how the principles of good prescribing should be applied to this case.  
  • Describe a cultural consideration that may affect medication adherence for this patient.

Submission Instructions:

  • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.  Your initial post is worth 8 points.
  • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.) 
  • All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.
  • Please post your initial response by 11:59 PM ET Thursday, and comment on the posts of two classmates by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.
  • Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of the instructor.
  • You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.