EVIDENCE-BASED PROJECT, PART 2: ADVANCED LEVELS OF CLINICAL INQUIRY AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS

EVIDENCE-BASED PROJECT, PART 2: ADVANCED LEVELS OF CLINICAL INQUIRY AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS

Your quest to purchase a new car begins with an identification of the factors important to you. As you conduct a search of cars that rate high on those factors, you collect evidence and try to understand the extent of that evidence. A report that suggests a certain make and model of automobile has high mileage is encouraging. But who produced that report? How valid is it? How was the data collected, and what was the sample size?

In this Assignment, you will delve deeper into clinical inquiry by closely examining your PICO(T) question. You also begin to analyze the evidence you have collected.

To Prepare:

· Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.

· Develop a PICO(T) question to address the clinical issue of interest you identified in Module 2 for the Assignment. This PICOT question will remain the same for the entire course.

· Use the key words from the PICO(T) question you developed and search at least four different databases in the Walden Library. Identify at least four relevant systematic reviews or other filtered high-level evidence, which includes meta-analyses, critically appraised topics (evidence syntheses), critically-appraised individual articles (article synopses). The evidence will not necessarily address all the elements of your PICO(T) question, so select the most important concepts to search and find the best evidence available.

· Reflect on the process of creating a PICO(T) question and searching for peer-reviewed research.

The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)

Part 2: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews

Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:

· Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.

· Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.

· Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

· Provide APA citations of the four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your research question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-analysis on your topic, then use the highest level of evidence peer reviewed article.

· Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.

LEARNING RESOURCES

Required Readings

· Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2023). 
Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.

· Chapter 2, “Asking Compelling Clinical Questions” (pp. 37–60)

· Chapter 3, “Finding Relevant Evidence to Answer Clinical Questions” (pp. 62–104)

· Davies, K. S. (2011). 
Formulating the evidence based practice question: A review of the frameworksLinks to an external site. for LIS professionals. 
Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 6(2), 75–80.

· Library of Congress. (n.d.). 

Search/browse help – Boolean operators and nestingLinks to an external site.

. Retrieved September 19, 2018, from https://catalog.loc.gov/vwebv/ui/en_US/htdocs/help/searchBoolean.html

· Stillwell, S. B., Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., & Williamson, K. M. (2010). 
Evidence-based practice, step by step: Asking the clinical question: A key step in evidence-based practice.Links to an external site. 
American Journal of Nursing, 110(3), 58–61.

· Melnyk, B. M., Fineout-Overholt, E., Stillwell, S. B., & Williamson, K. M. (2009).
Evidence-based practice: Step by step: Igniting a spirit of inquiryLinks to an external site.
.Links to an external site. 
American Journal of Nursing, 109(11), 49–52. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000363354.53883.58

· Stillwell, S.B., Fineout-Overhold, E., Melnyk, B.M., & Williamson, K.M. (2010). 
Evidence-based practice step-by-step: Searching for evidence.Links to an external site. 
American Journal of Nursing, 110(5), 41-47.

· Walden University Library. (n.d.-a).
 

Databases A-Z: NursingLinks to an external site.

. Retrieved September 6, 2019, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981

· Walden University Library. (n.d.-c).
Evidence-based practice research: CINAHL search helpLinks to an external site.
. Retrieved September 6, 2019, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/healthevidence/cinahlsearchhelp

· Walden University Library. (n.d.-d). 

Evidence-based practice research: Joanna Briggs Institute search helpLinks to an external site.
. Retrieved September 6, 2019, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/healthevidence/jbisearchhelp

· Walden University Library. (n.d.-e). 

Evidence-based practice research: MEDLINE search helpLinks to an external site.
. Retrieved September 6, 2019, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/healthevidence/medlinesearchhelp

· Walden University Library. (n.d.-f). Keyword searching: 
Finding articles on your topic: Boolean termsLinks to an external site.. Retrieved September 19, 2018, from http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/keyword/boolean

· Walden University Library. (n.d.-g). Keyword searching: Finding articles on your topic: 
Introduction to keyword searchingLinks to an external site.. Retrieved September 19, 2018, from http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/keyword/searching-basics

· Walden University Library. (n.d.-h). 

Quick Answers: How do I find a systematic review article related to health, medicine, or nursing?Links to an external site.
 Retrieved September 6, 2019, from https://academicanswers.waldenu.edu/faq/72670

· Walden University Library. (n.d.-i). 

Systematic review.Links to an external site.
 Retrieved January 22, 2020, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/healthevidence/types#s-lg-box-1520654

Impact of health literacy

What is an impact of health literacy on health outcome?

Discussion 250 words. Make sure you provide 2 references and utilize APA style.. . Discussion Rubric

Many organizations provide educational materials about osteoporosis, physical activity, and other topics pertinent to health promotion for musculoskeletal wellness. Some materials are available in Spanish and other languages, and many of these materials are free.

From the list below select on organization and an intervention that you could implement in your current place of work to promote health development of your patient/client population. State reasons why and the EBP behind your selection.

America on the Move Foundation


https://aom3.americaonthemove.org

American Cancer Society


www/cancer.org

American Heart Association


www.heart.org

Arthritis Foundation


www.arthritis.org

National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases


www.niams.nih.gov

National Cancer Institute


www.cancer.gov

National Osteoporosis Foundation


www.nof.org

Please note the grading rubric for the discussion board.

As a reminder, all discussion posts must be a minimum of 250 words, references must be cited in APA format 7th Edition and must include a minimum of 2 scholarly resources published within the past 5 years.

Introduction and quality of discussion’s Argument

60% of total result

Objectivity of Tone, overall quality & Review of Literature in APA 6th format within past 7 years

10% of total result

Grammar / Writing Skills

7% of total result

Demonstration Speech

API FORMAT.

They check for plagiarism.

Instructions in attachments.

Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

rt 2 Writing Assignment Week 7

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Health Promotion Proposal, Part 2 Content

1.

Top of Form

Health Promotion Proposal, Part 2

This is a continuation of the health promotion program proposal, part one, which you submitted previously. 

Please approach this assignment as an opportunity to integrate instructor feedback from part I and expand on ideas adhering to the components of the MAP-IT strategy. Include necessary levels of detail you feel appropriate to assure stakeholder buy-in.

 

Directions 

You have already completed the steps 1-4. 
Do not resubmit part 1. Make sure you revise this initial submission according to your instructor’s comments. 

To assist in maintaining harmony between Part I and 2 here you have a reminder of the previous paper outline:

· 1. Describe the health problem. Using data and statistics support your claim that the issue you selected is a problem. What specifically will you address in your proposed health promotion program? Be sure your proposed outcome is realistic and measurable. 

· 2. Describe the vulnerable population and setting. What are the risk factors that make this a vulnerable population? Use evidence to support the risk factors you have identified. 

· 3. Provide a review of literature from scholarly journals of evidence-based interventions that address the problem. After completing a library search related to effective interventions for your chosen health promotion activity, you will write a review that evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of all the sources you have found. You might consult research texts for information on how to write a review of the literature found in your search. 

· 4. Select an appropriate health promotion/disease prevention theoretical framework or conceptual model that would best serve as the framework guiding the proposal. Provide rationale for your selection which includes discussion of the concepts of the selected model 

 

For this assignment develop criteria 5-8 as detailed below: 

You will submit just this section 5-8 as essay. Please do not resubmit Part 1. 

Use a presentation page. Start the body of content with topic 5.

· 5. Propose a health promotion program using an evidence-based intervention found in your literature search to address the problem in the selected population/setting. Include a thorough discussion of the specifics of this intervention which include resources necessary, those involved, and feasibility for a nurse in an advanced role. 

· Be certain to include a timeline. (2 to 4 paragraphs- you may use bullets if appropriate). 

· 6. Thoroughly describe the intended outcomes. Describe the outcomes in detail concurrent with the SMART goal approach. 
The SMART goal statement should be no more than one sentence (1 paragraph). 

· 7. Provide a detailed plan for evaluation for each outcome. (1 paragraph). 

· 8. Thoroughly describe possible barriers/challenges to implementing the proposed project as well as strategies to address these barriers/challenges. (1 paragraph). 

· Finish the paper with a conclusion paragraph (1 paragraph) without typing the word “conclusion” before the paragraph. 

Paper Requirements 

Your assignment should be up to 3-5 pages (excluding title page and references). 

Remember, your Proposal must be a scholarly paper demonstrating graduate school level writing and critical analysis of existing nursing knowledge about health promotion. 

Finish the essay with a your reference page.

Please review the Grading Rubric for this Assignment.

 

Bottom of Form

EVIDENCE BASE IN DESIGN


Maria Hernandez

Main Post:

H.R. 977- Patient Access to Higher Quality Health Care Act of 2023.

 

Description: When a patient has health insurance, depending on which premium, they are made to use providers or hospitals that are “in-network” to avoid higher costs of services. This can often be an issue for patients because some providers are not in network with their health insurance, specifically Medicare recipients. The Patient Access to Higher Quality Health Care Act would “repeal changes made by health care reform laws to the Medicare exception to the prohibition on certain physician referrals for hospitals” (Congress.gov, 2023).

Background: According to the American Hospital Association, “For decades, the Ethics in Patient Referrals Act (“Stark Law”) has protected the Medicare program from the inherent conflict of interest created when physicians self-refer their patients to facilities and services in which they have a financial stake” (AHA, n.d.). At one point, physicians were allowed to make referrals to hospitals with ownership within the entire facility; this gap was closed in 2010 when the Affordable Care Act was passed.  

Social Determinant: One social determinant is access to health care and quality care. Patients, regardless of their socioeconomic status, should receive high-quality care. The American Hospital Association states, “The Government Accountability Office (GAO), the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and MedPAC all found that physician-owned hospitals’ patients tend to be healthier than patients with the same diagnoses at general hospitals” (AHA, n.d.). This would lead those with serious illnesses to rely on general hospitals for healthcare services.

Evidence: The growth of Physician-owned hospitals was prohibited in 2010 after the passing of the Affordable Care Act. According to Ehrenfeld, “a systematic review of 30 years of research demonstrating that physician-owned specialty hospitals or so-called “focused factories” offer higher-quality care at comparable or lower cost, while physician-owned community hospitals are no worse than their counterparts” (Ehrenfeld, 2023). If H.R. 977 is passed into law, it would allow physicians of physician-owned hospitals to extend their services to the community by opening new hospitals that would provide high-quality, efficient care and be affordable to patients. This would place competition against general hospitals at risk of losing market share, leading them to reform their services to stay in competition. This would benefit patients in being able to seek assistance in a variety of hospital or hospital-owned facilities. 

 

References:

American Hospital Association. (n.d.). Fact sheet: Physician self-referral to physician-owned hospitals. https://www.aha.org/fact-sheets/2023-02-27-fact-sheet-physician-self-referral-physician-owned-hospitals

Congress.gov. (n.d.). H.R.977 – 118th Congress (2023-2024): Patient Access to Higher Quality Health Care Act of 2023. https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/977?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22HR+977%22%5D%7D&s=1&r=1

Ehrenfeld, J. M. (2023, August 10). End restrictions on physician-owned hospitals to expand Quality Care. American Medical Association. https://www.ama-assn.org/about/leadership/end-restrictions-physician-owned-hospitals-expand-quality-care

Requesting writing tutor

HED

HED

In the article The Quintuple Aim for Health Care Improvement: A New Imperative to Advance Health Equity [PDF], the authors focus on the need for health equity in the U.S. and the World through:

Identification of Disparities

Designing and Implementing Evidence-Based Interventions to Reduce Disparities

Investing in Equity Measurement

Incentivizing the Achievement of Equity

In 250 to 300 words discuss the addition of health equity to complete the Quintuple Aim and outline how you will integrate the recommendations to achieve health equity into the organization if you were the CEO.

Culture Plan of Care

One is an individual plan of care. This can be a (personal plan of care based on your own culture or a culture of your choice).

In place of an APA ASSIGNMENT,  please draft an individual plan of care related to one’s personal culture or a selected population of interest. 

  • The culture that is being recognized.
  • Unique traits of that culture (language, preferences, family dynamics, dietary needs).
  • Health problems associated with that culture.
  • Corrective measures and community resources.
  • Expected outcomes. 
  • Include citations to support your presented data

PLEASE DO IT ON MEXICAN CULTURE

DISCUSSION RESPONSES

Respond to the 4 colleagues  by suggesting a different way of framing their critical question. Cite sources to support your posts and recommend to colleagues. provide at least 2 references each.

CLARIFYING CONNECTIONS: PRACTICE PROBLEM, EVIDENCE, CHANGING PRACTICE

To prepare:

  • Review the Module 4 Learning Resources with guidance for analyzing and synthesizing evidence from your literature review.
  • Complete your analysis of outcomes and synthesis of evidence to inform a practice change.
  • Consider the linkage between your practice problem, evidence to address it, and the need for a practice change initiative.
  • Assess the strength of this linkage and how to present it to colleagues.

With these thoughts in mind …

Post an explanation of the results of your literature review and the connection to your practice problem. Then, explain your synthesis of evidence on which to base a practice change, and the need for a practice change initiative. Be specific and provide examples. PLEASE INCLUDE AT LEAST 3 REFERENCES

module 4 learning resources: