BHA370 Module 1 Case SLP Module 1

10/9/23, 11:32 AM Case – BHA370 Strategic Delivery of Healthcare Services (2023OCT09FT-1)

https://tlc.trident.edu/d2l/le/content/202712/viewContent/5129358/View 1/2

Module 1 – Case

STRATEGIC PLANNING AND PROCESSES

Assignment Overview

Strategic planning in healthcare typically involves a number of people with diverse
ethnicities, various ages, multiple race groups, and different experiences. An
interdisciplinary approach involves team members from different disciplines working
collaboratively, with a common purpose, to set goals, make decisions, and share
resources and responsibilities. Strategic plans are designed to build an inclusive
environment, plan for the equity of the organization, and to develop objectives to
support viability. Examining external industry competition aids in gauging and
designing performance measures to meet prospective goals.

Case Assignment

In a 2-page paper, answer the following questions:

1. What roles do boards of directors, C-Suite employees, physicians, general
employees, and the community play in a healthcare organization’s strategic-
planning process?

2. Does the diversity of a healthcare organization’s staff have any impact on the
strategic-planning process? Explain your rationale.

Assignment Expectations

1. Conduct additional research to gather sufficient information to justify/support your
responses.

2. Limit your response to a maximum of 2 pages (title and reference pages are not
included in the page number count).

3. Support your responses with peer-reviewed articles, with 2 to 3 references. Use
the following link for additional information on how to recognize peer-reviewed
journals:
How to Recognize Peer-Reviewed (Refereed) Journals
http://www.angelo.edu/services/library/handouts/peerrev.php.

4. You may use the following source to assist in formatting your assignment:
Purdue Owl – https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/.

Listen

10/9/23, 11:32 AM Case – BHA370 Strategic Delivery of Healthcare Services (2023OCT09FT-1)

https://tlc.trident.edu/d2l/le/content/202712/viewContent/5129358/View 2/2

Privacy Policy | Contact

5. For additional information on reliability of sources, review the following
source: https://nccih.nih.gov/health/webresources.

6. This assignment will be graded based on the Case Assignment rubric.

LEGAL AND ETHICAL ISSUES RELATED TO PSYCHIATRIC EMERGENCIES

The diagnosis of psychiatric emergencies can include a wide range of problems—from serious drug reactions to abuse and suicidal ideation/behaviors. Regardless of care setting, the PMHNP must know how to address emergencies, coordinate care with other members of the health care team and law enforcement officials (when indicated), and effectively communicate with family members who are often overwhelmed in emergency situations. In their role, PMHNPs can ensure a smooth transition from emergency mental health care to follow-up care, and also bridge the physical–mental health divide in healthcare.

In this week’s Assignment, you explore legal and ethical issues surrounding psychiatric emergencies, and identify evidence-based suicide and violence risk assessments. 

TO PREPARE

· Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide about psychiatric emergencies and the ethical and legal issues surrounding these events.

THE ASSIGNMENT

In 2–3 pages, address the following:

· Explain your state laws for involuntary psychiatric holds for child and adult psychiatric emergencies. Include who can hold a patient and for how long, who can release the emergency hold, and who can pick up the patient after a hold is released.

· Explain the differences among emergency hospitalization for evaluation/psychiatric hold, inpatient commitment, and outpatient commitment in your state.

· Explain the difference between capacity and competency in mental health contexts.

· Select one of the following topics, and explain one legal issue and one ethical issue related to this topic that may apply within the context of treating psychiatric emergencies: patient autonomy, EMTALA, confidentiality, HIPAA privacy rule, HIPAA security rule, protected information, legal gun ownership, career obstacles (security clearances/background checks), and payer source.

· Identify one evidence-based suicide risk assessment that you could use to screen patients.

· Identify one evidence-based violence risk assessment that you could use to screen patients.

NURSING

Student Instructions for i-Human Virtual Simulation

NR325/NR330 Scott Baldwin


PURPOSE:

The following information is to be used in guiding your preparation and participation in the virtual simulation scenario for this course. This document will provide applicable course outcomes in preparation for your simulation.

SCENARIO OVERVIEW:

19-year-old male presents to the emergency department for a single episode of collapse with jerking and a loss of consciousness.

LEARNER OBJECTIVES:

1. Define the components of a focused nursing assessment. (CO1, 2)

2. Explain the approach for a focused nursing assessment for an adult brought to the emergency department, via ambulance, for a single episode of collapse with jerking and loss of consciousness. (CO1, 2)

3. Demonstrate an appropriate assessment for an adult brought to the emergency department, via ambulance, for a single episode of collapse with jerking and loss of consciousness. (CO1, 2, 3)

4. Distinguish between the treatment/interventions options for an adult brought to the emergency department, via ambulance, for a single episode of collapse with jerking and loss of consciousness. (CO1, 2, 4, 6)

5. Recommend appropriate treatment/interventions for an adult brought to the emergency department, via ambulance, for a single episode of collapse with jerking and loss of consciousness. (CO1, 2, 3, 4, 6)

6. Design an appropriate care plan for an adult brought to the emergency department, via ambulance, for a single episode of collapse with jerking and loss of consciousness. (CO1, 2, 4, 6)

STUDENT ROLES DURING SIMULATION:

You are the staff nurse at the hospital who will be conducting a comprehensive assessment. After completing your assessment, you are expected to document your findings as a nurses note in SBAR format.

KEY FEATURES OF i-HUMAN:

· As the nurse, you are expected to complete the case scenario using the following tabs: EHR, History, Physical, Nursing Notes, Summary

· There are required questions and/or additional information provided related to this case. The questions, information, and videos must be completed/reviewed prior to progressing to the next tab.

· Nursing Notes: At the end of the simulation, you will document your assessment findings using ISBAR.

CONFIDENTIALITY:

To preserve the educational value, integrity, and safety of the learning environment, you agree to maintain strict confidentiality about the proceedings of the simulation session, details of the training scenarios, and the performance of all participants. You acknowledge that this expectation aligns with the guidelines related to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) as well as laws governing Protected Health Information (PHI) in client care environments.  You will not view, discuss, share, record, or disclose any confidential information pertaining to the session. You understand that lapses in confidentiality are considered academic misconduct and could result in dismissal from the academic program. 

 

FICTION AGREEMENT:

You will suspend judgment of realism for any given simulation in exchange for the promise of learning new knowledge and skills, treating the simulated patients with the same care due an actual patient, act with a genuine desire to learn even when it may be difficult to do so.  

DUE DATE:

The virtual simulation must be completed during

Week 5
.

SIMULATION TIMING:

· Pre-simulation preparation: 30-60 minutes

· Pre-brief: 15 minutes

· Run Time: 2.75 hours

· Debriefing: 60 minutes

ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION

Faculty will utilize your participation measurements in the i-Human case, and debriefing discussions to identify areas of opportunity for enhancement of your clinical growth. Your experiences in i-Human will contribute to your overall completion of clinical requirements for the course as documented on the Clinical Learning Evaluation tool.

i-Human Evaluation – What does my total score mean?

A screenshot of a computer  Description automatically generated with medium confidence

REVIEW AND COMPLETE PRIOR TO THE START OF THE VIRTUAL SIMULATION:

To prepare for the simulation, you are
required to complete the pre-simulation questions below and submit this prework to the faculty via uploading your Word document in Canvas prior to the start of the virtual simulation. If you do not complete the pre-simulation questions and upload them, you will

not
be able to access or participate in the simulation.

1. Create a list of symptoms/cues a nurse would expect to find during each of the phases of a seizure.

a. Pre-Ictal Phase

b. Early Ictal Phase

c. Late Ictal Phase

d. Post-Ictal Phase

2. The healthcare provider ordered Lorazepam PRN for a client at risk for having a seizure. Describe the information that a nurse should know prior to administration including:

a. Purpose of the Medication

b. Therapeutic Use

c. Complications

d. Interventions

e. Medication Administration, Contraindications, Precautions

f. Nursing Interventions

g. Client Education

h. Evaluation of Medication Effectiveness

3. A nurse is caring for a client who suddenly begins to have a seizure. What are the priority nursing actions?

**Immediately following the completion of the virtual simulation, you will complete the evaluation of the simulation using the link provided.

©2023 Chamberlain University LLC. All rights reserved.

Chamberlain University | National Management Offices | 500 W. Monroe St., Suite 1300 | Chicago, IL 60661

image1.png

image2.jpg

Nursing

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to investigate informatics in healthcare and to apply professional, ethical, and legal principles to its appropriate use in healthcare technology.

Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 4: Investigate safeguards and decision‐making support tools embedded in patient care technologies and information systems to support a safe practice environment for both patients and healthcare workers. (PO 4)

CO 6: Discuss the principles of data integrity, professional ethics, and legal requirements related to data security, regulatory requirements, confidentiality, and client’s right to privacy. (PO 6)

CO 8: Discuss the value of best evidence as a driving force to institute change in the delivery of nursing care. (PO 8)

Due date: Your faculty member will inform you when this assignment is due. The Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment.

Total points possible: 200 points

Preparing the assignment

Your faculty member will provide a scenario for you to address in your paper. Choose an ending to the scenario, and construct your paper based on those reflections. Choose one of the following outcomes for the end of the scenario:

1. A HIPAA violation occurs, and client data is exposed to the media.

2. A medication error has harmed a client.

3. A technology downtime that impacts patient care occurs, and an error is made.

4. A ransomware attack has occurred, and the organization must contemplate paying the ransom or lose access to patient data.

Follow these guidelines when completing this assignment. Speak with your faculty member if you have questions. Include the following sections:

a. Introduction – 20 points/10%

· Presents a clearly designed thesis statement or argument.

· Provides a clear and concise overview of the content.

· Offers a compelling argument to elicit the readers attention and generate interest.

b. HIPAA, Legal, and Regulatory Discussion – 20 points/10%

· Identify client privacy and HIPPAA standards as they relate to the impact of technology on nursing care.

· Review healthcare regulations as they relate to the impact of technology on nursing care.

· Describe legal guidelines on appropriate use of technology.

c. Scenario Ending and Recommendations – 50 points/25%

· Presents the selected or assigned scenario ending as the focus of the assignment.

· Evaluates the actions taken by healthcare providers selected or assigned scenario evolves.

· Recommends actions to mitigate the injury sustained in the selected scenario ending.

· Supports recommendations with evidence from recent scholarly publications.

d. Advantages and Disadvantages – 50 points/25%

· Presents at least two advantages of using the specified technology in healthcare.

· Presents at least two risks of using the specified technology in healthcare.

· Describes professional and ethical principles guiding the appropriate use of technology in healthcare.

· Support advantages and risks with evidence from recent scholarly publications.

e. Conclusion and Reflections – 40 points/20%

· Summarizes the selected or assigned scenarios ending including the recommendations.

· Establishes a clear link between the discussion and the thesis statement or argument.

· Discusses thoughtful insights and implications based on the outcomes.

· Describes how new insights will impact future behavior as a healthcare professional.

f. APA Style and Organization – 20 points/10%

· References are submitted with assignment.

· Uses current APA format and is free of errors.

· Grammar and mechanics are free of errors.

· Paper is 4-5 pages, excluding title and reference pages.

· At least three (3) scholarly, primary sources from the last 5 years, excluding the textbook, are provided.

For writing assistance, visit the Writing Center.

Please note that your instructor may provide you with additional assessments in any form to determine that you fully understand the concepts learned in the review module.

· A scenario is to be used to complete the RUA: We Can But Dare We paper that is due at the end of week 4. Below is the scenario; please do not use any other scenario for this assignment. Logistics and details, including scenario ending choices, regarding the paper can be found in the RUA: We Can But Dare We grading rubric found in the Unit 4 module.

Scenario:

You are an emergency department nurse responding to a severe freeway accident. As a triage registered nurse determining the severity of each case and maintaining proper flow, it is your duty to review all patients impacted by this event. While reviewing patients coming in, you stumble across a familiar name, which happens to be the name of a famous actor, Governor Gru. Upon determining this, you happen to take a photo of the data and post about the finding on your social media account.

To complete this paper, please choose an appropriate scenario ending listed in the RUA We Can But Dare We rubric (which is also attached to this announcement).

 

THIS IS AN INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT. Each of you will write your own paper.

This assignment will be submitted to Turn It In and will be screened for integrity violations. TRY NOT use quotes of any kind. (1 is acceptable). If you paraphrase and cite all content you will significantly reduce your similarity score.

 FOLLOW THE RUBRIC to receive full points! 

Please reach out to your assigned faculty member with questions!


NR360 Information Systems in Healthcare

We Can, But Dare We? Guidelines

© 2023 Chamberlain University. All Rights Reserved.

NR360_ RUA_We_Can_But_Dare_We_Guidelines_SEP23 1

Grading Rubric Criteria are met when the student’s application of knowledge demonstrates achievement of the outcomes for this assignment.

Assignment Section and Required Criteria

(Points possible/% of total points available)

Highest Level of Performance

High Level of Performance

Satisfactory Level of Performance

Unsatisfactory Level of Performance

Section not present

Introduction

(20 points/10%)

20 points

10 points

5 points

0 points

Required criteria

1. Presents a clearly designed thesis statement or argument.

2. Provides a clear and concise overview of the content.

3. Offers a compelling argument to elicit the reader’s attention and generate interest.

Meets all requirements for section.

Includes no fewer than 2 requirements for section.

Includes no fewer than 1 requirement for section.

No requirements for this section presented.

HIPAA, Legal, and Regulatory Discussion

(20 points/10%)

20 points

10 points

5 points

0 points

Required criteria

1. Identify client privacy and HIPPAA standards as they relate to the impact of technology on nursing care.

2. Review healthcare regulations as they relate to the impact of technology on nursing care.

3. Describe legal guidelines on appropriate use of technology.

Meets all requirements for section.

Includes no fewer than 2 requirements for section.

Includes no fewer than 1 requirement for section.

No requirements for this section presented.

Scenario Ending and Recommendations

(50 points/25%)

50 points

43 points

38 points

19 points

0 points

Required criteria

1. Presents the selected or assigned scenario ending as the focus of the assignment.

2. Evaluates the actions taken by healthcare providers selected or assigned scenario evolves.

3. Recommends actions to mitigate the injury sustained in the selected scenario ending.

4. Supports recommendations with evidence from recent scholarly publications.

Meets all requirements for section.

Includes no fewer than 3 requirements for section.

Includes 2 requirements for section.

Includes 1 requirements for section.

No requirements for this section presented.

Advantages and Disadvantages

(50 points/25%)

50 points

43 points

38 points

19 points

0 points

Required criteria

1. Presents at least two advantages of using the specified technology in healthcare.

2. Presents at least two risks of using the specified technology in healthcare.

3. Describes professional and ethical principles guiding the appropriate use of technology in healthcare.

4. Support advantages and risks with evidence from recent scholarly publications.

Meets all requirements for section.

Includes no fewer than 3 requirements for section.

Includes 2 requirements for section.

Includes 1 requirements for section.

No requirements for this section presented.

Conclusion and Reflections

(40 points/20%)

40 points

34 points

30 points

15 points

0 points

Required criteria

1. Summarizes the selected or assigned scenarios ending including the recommendations.

2. Establishes a clear link between the discussion and the thesis statement or argument.

3. Discusses thoughtful insights and implications based on the outcomes.

4. Describes how new insights will impact future behavior as a healthcare professional.

Meets all requirements for section.

Includes no fewer than 3 requirements for section.

Includes 2 requirements for section.

Includes 1 requirements for section.

No requirements for this section presented.

APA Style and Organization

(20 points/10%)

20 points

18 points

16 points

8 points

0 points

Required criteria

1. References are submitted with assignment.

2. Uses current APA format and is free of errors.

3. Grammar and mechanics are free of errors.

4. Paper is 4-5 pages, excluding title and reference pages.

5. At least three (3) scholarly, primary sources from the last 5 years, excluding the textbook, are provided.

Includes all requirements for section.

Includes 4 requirements for section.

Includes 3 requirements for section.

Includes 1-2 requirements for section.

No requirements for this section presented.

Total Points Possible = 200 points

© 2023 Chamberlain University. All Rights Reserved.

NR360_ RUA_We_Can_But_Dare_We_Guidelines_SEP23 4

image1.png

week 5 discussion asnwers

Please respond to each discussion post with 4 to 5 sentences with apa references for each 

Module 10 Case study- mREEN

Read the following case study and answer the reflective questions.  Please provide evidence-based rationales for your answers.  APA, 7th ed. must be followed. 

THE NURSING ROLE

ADVOCATING FOR THE NURSING ROLE IN PROGRAM DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION

As their names imply, the honeyguide bird and the honey badger both share an affinity for honey. Honeyguide birds specialize in finding beehives but struggle to access the honey within. Honey badgers are well-equipped to raid beehives but cannot always find them. However, these two honey-loving species have learned to collaborate on an effective means to meet their objectives. The honeyguide bird guides honey badgers to newly discovered hives. Once the honey badger has ransacked the hive, the honey guide bird safely enters to enjoy the leftover honey.

Much like honeyguide birds and honey badgers, nurses and health professionals from other specialty areas can—and should—collaborate to design effective programs. Nurses bring specialties to the table that make them natural partners to professionals with different specialties. When nurses take the requisite leadership in becoming involved throughout the healthcare system, these partnerships can better design and deliver highly effective programs that meet objectives.

In this Assignment, you will practice this type of leadership by advocating for a healthcare program. Equally as important, you will advocate for a collaborative role of the nurse in the design and implementation of this program. To do this, assume you are preparing to be interviewed by a professional organization/publication regarding your thoughts on the role of the nurse in the design and implementation of new healthcare programs.

Resources:

· Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse's guide (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

· Chapter 5, “Public Policy Design” (pp. 87–95 only)

· Chapter 8, “The Impact of EHRs, Big Data, and Evidence-Informed Practice” (pp. 137–146)

· Chapter 9, “Interprofessional Practice” (pp. 152–160 only)

· Chapter 10, “Overview: The Economics and Finance of Health Care” (pp. 183–191 only)

· American Nurses Association (ANA). (n.d.). 
AdvocacyLinks to an external site.. Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/advocacy/

· Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (n.d.). 
Step by step: Evaluating violence and injury prevention policies: Brief 4: Evaluating policy implementationLinks to an external site.. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/injury/pdfs/policy/Brief%204-a.pdf

·
Congress.govLinks to an external site.. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.congress.gov/

· Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996). 
The challenge of innovation implementationLinks to an external site.. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1055–1080.

· Sacristán, J., & Dilla, T. D. (2015). 
No big data without small data: Learning health care systems begin and end with the individual patientLinks to an external site.. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 21(6), 1014–1017.

· Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2014). 
Policy implementation, street level bureaucracy, and the importance of discretionLinks to an external site.. Public Management Review, 16(4), 527–547.

To Prepare:

· Review the Resources and reflect on your thinking regarding the role of the nurse in the design and implementation of new healthcare programs.

· Select a healthcare program within your practice and consider the design and implementation of this program.

· Reflect on advocacy efforts and the role of the nurse in relation to healthcare program design and implementation.

The Assignment: (2–4 pages)

In a 2- to 4-page paper, create an interview transcript of your responses to the following interview questions:

·
Tell us about a healthcare program, within your practice. What are the costs and projected outcomes of this program?

·
Who is your target population?

·
What is the role of the nurse in providing input for the design of this healthcare program? Can you provide examples?

·
What is your role as an advocate for your target population for this healthcare program? Do you have input into design decisions? How else do you impact design?

·
What is the role of the nurse in healthcare program implementation? How does this role vary between design and implementation of healthcare programs? Can you provide examples?

·
Who are the members of a healthcare team that you believe are most needed to implement a program? Can you explain why?

instruction below

For this assessment, you will create a 2-4 page plan proposal for an interprofessional team to collaborate and work toward driving improvements in the organizational issue you identified in the second assessment.

Collapse All

Introduction

The health care industry is always striving to improve patient outcomes and attain organizational goals. Nurses can play a critical role in achieving these goals; one way to encourage nurse participation in larger organizational efforts is to create a shared vision and team goals (Mulvale et al., 2016). Participation in interdisciplinary teams can also offer nurses opportunities to share their expertise and leadership skills, fostering a sense of ownership and collegiality.

You are encouraged to complete the Budgeting for Nurses activity before you develop the plan proposal. The activity consists of seven questions that will allow you the opportunity to check your knowledge of budgeting basics and as well as the value of financial resource management. The information gained from completing this formative will promote success with the Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal. Completing this activity also demonstrates your engagement in the course, requires just a few minutes of your time, and is not graded.

Demonstration of Proficiency

  • Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health.
    • Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to be a success and the impacts on those resources if nothing is done, related to the improvements sought by the plan.
  • Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.
    • Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific objective related to improving patient or organizational outcomes.
    • Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective. Include best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.
  • Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.
    • Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that are most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.
  • Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.
    • Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
    • Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

Reference

Mulvale, G., Embrett, M., & Shaghayegh, D. R. (2016). ‘Gearing up’ to improve interprofessional collaboration in primary care: A systematic review and conceptual framework. BMC Family Practice, 17.

Professional Context

This assessment will allow you to describe a plan proposal that includes an analysis of best practices of interprofessional collaboration, change theory, leadership strategies, and organizational resources with a financial budget that can be used to solve the problem identified through the interview you conducted in the prior assessment.

Scenario

Having reviewed the information gleaned from your professional interview and identified the issue, you will determine and present an objective for an interdisciplinary intervention to address the issue.

Note: You will not be expected to implement the plan during this course. However, the plan should be evidence-based and realistic within the context of the issue and your interviewee’s organization.

Instructions

For this assessment, use the context of the organization where you conducted your interview to develop a viable plan for an interdisciplinary team to address the issue you identified. Define a specific patient or organizational outcome or objective based on the information gathered in your interview.

The goal of this assessment is to clearly lay out the improvement objective for your planned interdisciplinary intervention of the issue you identified. Additionally, be sure to further build on the leadership, change, and collaboration research you completed in the previous assessment. Look for specific, real-world ways in which those strategies and best practices could be applied to encourage buy-in for the plan or facilitate the implementation of the plan for the best possible outcome.

Using the Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal Template [DOCX] Download Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal Template [DOCX]will help you stay organized and concise. As you complete each section of the template, make sure you apply APA format to in-text citations for the evidence and best practices that inform your plan, as well as the reference list at the end.

Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

  • Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific goal related to improving patient or organizational outcomes.
  • Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that is most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.
  • Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective. Include best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.
  • Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to succeed and the impacts on those resources if the improvements described in the plan are not made.
  • Communicate the interdisciplinary plan, with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.

Additional Requirements

  • Length of submission: Use the provided template. Remember that part of this assessment is to make the plan easy to understand and use, so it is critical that you are clear and concise. Most submissions will be 2–4 pages in length. Be sure to include a reference page at the end of the plan.
  • Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.
  • APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations and reference list follow current APA style.

Note: Faculty may use the Writing Feedback Tool when grading this assessment. The Writing Feedback Tool is designed to provide you with guidance and resources to develop your writing based on five core skills. You will find writing feedback in the Scoring Guide for the assessment, once your work has been evaluated.

Portfolio Prompt: Remember to save the final assessment to your ePortfolio so that you may refer to it as you complete the final Capstone course.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

  • Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health.
    • Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to succeed and the impacts on those resources if nothing is done to make the improvements sought by the plan.
  • Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.
    • Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective, including best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.
  • Competency 3: Describe ways to incorporate evidence-based practice within an interdisciplinary team.
    • Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific goal related to improving patient or organizational outcomes.
  • Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.
    • Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that is most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.
  • Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.
    • Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
    • Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

Abstract for Hypertension in the homeless

Please see the attachment for the instructions

Nurse-scholars have a significant obligation to their community as well. Their work must have academic and professional integrity.

 Nurse-scholars have a significant obligation to their community as well. Their work must have academic and professional integrity.