Cardiovascular

Discuss what is happening on a cellular level with the disease process. Be careful to realize that patients have co-morbidities and you may need to discuss the other diseases impact on the pathophysiology and care of the patient.  Three (3) resources after 2008 are required along with APA format. 

A 70 year old black American female who has the following
preexisting conditions;

Hypertension (HTN): longterm

Heart failure (CHF) : 2 months

Coronary artery disease (CAD) : longterm

Myocardial infarction (MI) : five years ago

Ejection (EF) of 55% : 2 months ago

Socioeconomic data:

Widow, Lives alone, independent ADL’s, Nonsmoker, Nondrinker

Pharmacologic data:

Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid, ASA)

Clopidogrel bisulfate (Plavix)

Lisinopril (Prinivil, Zestril)

Carvedilol (Coreg)

Furosemide (Lasix)

Potassium chloride (KCL)

Client Profile:

70 year old woman originally from Alabama. She lives alone and is able to manage herself independently. She is active in her community and church. Diagnosed with heart failure 2 months age and is followed up at home with a visiting nurse every other week for to assist is managing her heart failure symptoms. She is being referred to the nurse practitioner for follow up of changes in her symptoms.

Assessment:

At the office the following subjective and objective data was supplied:

“I noticed my legs were getting a bit bigger and they are achy, too.”

She has gained 10 pounds over the last 5 days.

She gets short of breath when ambulating from one room to the other (approximately 20 feet) and must sit down to catch her breath.

Her oxygen saturation is 95% on room air. Bibasilar crackles are heard when auscultating her lung sounds.

She denies any chest, arm, or jaw pain or nausea.

She denies any back pain, stomach pain, confusion, dizziness, or a feeling faint.

She admits only to feeling a little more tired than usual.

Eats Southern Cooking when at home.

Vital signs :

T= 97.6 F (36.4C), BP 140/70, P 93, R 22.

Labs ordered:

complete blood count (CBC), basic metabolic panel (BMP), brain natriuretic peptide (B-type natriuretic peptide assay or BNP), troponin, creatine kinase (CPK), creatine kinase-MB (CKMB), and albumin. The APN also prescribes oral (PO) Furosemide and arranges an outpatient electrocardiogram (ECG, EKG), chest X-ray, and echocardiogram.

Questions

1. Which assessment findings during this visit are consistent with heart failure?

2. Why did the APN ask about back pain, stomach pain, confusion, dizziness or a feeling that she might faint?

3. Explain what the following terms indicate and include the normal values: cardiac output, stroke volume, afterload, preload, ejection fraction and central venous pressure. Is an ejection fraction of 55% significant. Provide rationale.

5. Discuss the body’s compensatory mechanisms during hear failure. Include an explanation of the Frank-Starling law in your discussion.

6. Heart failure can be classified as left or right ventricular failure, systolic versus diastolic, according to the New York Heart Association (NYHA) and using the ACC/AHA (American Heart Association) guidelines. Explain these four classification systems and the signs and symptoms that characterize each. Which Classification fits this patient?

7. Provide a rationale for why each of the following medications have been prescribed: Aspirin, Clopidogrel bisulfate (Plavix), Lisinopril(Prinivil/Zestril) , and Carvedilol (Coreg).

8. What information will each of the following tests provide: CBC, BMP, BNP, Troponin, CPK, CKMB, and albumin, EKG, CXR, and Echocardiogram

Reflection:

Please see the attachment for instructions

COUGH

 

  

Subjective

Danny Rivera is an 8 years old boy presenting with a wet cough. He reports that the cough has lasted three days. He describes the cough as wet and gurly.

Objective

The cough is temporarily treated by the children’s cough medicine his mother gave him. He reports that the cough is not aggravated by activity. He reports the cough gets worse at night, which keep him up at night. He reports tenderness of his throat. He reports a history of frequent rhinorrhea and cough. Risk factor includes second-hand smoke from father, history of pneumonia in the past year, and being overwiegt for his age.

Assessment

He has no acute respiratory distress, his lungs are clear to auscultation and is afebrile, He has current rhinorrhea, examination of the nose reveals boggy turbinate. His throat appears red with visible cobblestoning in the back. His respiratory rate is inscreased, and he present mild tachycardia.

Plan

I recomende calling his grandmother to pick him up from school. He should see his primary care provider within the next few days for an evaluation and tests to rule out asthma and allergies. In the meantime, he should be allowed to rest and should be given cough medicine as needed.

Module 6 case study-5550

Read the following case study and answer the reflective questions.  Please provide evidence-based rationales for your answers.  APA, 7th ed. must be followed. 

Potential Outcomes and Metrics

 

outline the metrics you would use to measure the success of your proposed intervention. Include the source of your metrics (should be from the evidence-based practice literature) and the hypothesized outcomes you anticipate from the intervention. Include risks and both potential positive and negative outcomes.

Cite any sources in APA format.

Power points slides

Power points slides

Discussion Post- Past Experience with Research

Describe your experience in the utilization of nursing research in your clinical practice.

Submission Instructions:

  • Post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. 

Reply to your classmate

The United States Supreme Court is the highest federal judicial system with ultimate appellate jurisdiction over federal court cases. Once the supreme court makes its final judgment, no other body can overturn it. The number of cases taken to the Supreme Court is limited because it deals with the most sensitive matters (Greenberg et al., 2020). Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization is among the recent cases handled by the Supreme Court. Supreme Court rejected the previous court decision and gave states the power to regulate abortion after arguing that there is no federal right to abortion in the American Constitution (Lambert et al., 2023). This case was appealed severally before it reached the Supreme Court. Supreme Court judges revised the decisions made before by lower courts. This law presented national implications since the American states were given the power to enact their regulations regarding the same since abortion rights are not protected by the federal constitution. After the Supreme Court decision, many states have established new laws prohibiting abortion.

As a medical professional, I do not support this decision because I believe it was influenced by the political environment rather than findings from clinical studies and scientific facts. Once a supreme court decides, the likelihood of overturning the decision is minimal. Women can seek medical abortion due to many personal matters, and as we respect the patient’s autonomy, women’s decisions should be respected. Our constitution protects the right to privacy under the 14th Amendment. Thus, any woman's decision to seek an abortion should be treated like a privacy right and not be exposed without consent or permission. Therefore, it would be better if the supreme court revised and reversed this decision.

 

 

 

References

Greenberg, E.S., Page, B.I., Doherty, D. Minkoff, S.L., & Ryan, J. M. (2020). 
The struggle for democracy. (2018 elections and updates ed.). Pearson.

Lambert, S. J., Horvath, S. K., & Casas, R. S. (2023). Impact of the Dobbs decision on medical education and training in abortion care. 
Women's Health Issues.

 

Discussion Post-Political Issues for Nursing

 

Go to the ANA home page and search for their Advocacy Policy. Read through the ANA Advocacy Policy’s web pages.

Look at issues at a federal, state, or local level for which the ANA is advocating change or new policies.

Which one are you most eager to see enacted? Why does it interest you? How will passage of such legislation affect you or your patients?

https://www.nursingworld.org/

reflection

This week, we talked about the Resilience Portfolio Model and profiles of strengths and resilience. We also took a look at the Resilience Portfolio Interview, which can be found here:


There are two tasks for this assignment: One is to reflect on yourself, and the other is to discuss counseling practice applications of assessing resilience. How you do that could be quite variable, however!

(1) For this reflection, ask yourself some of the questions from this interview and share a little about some of your personal resilience factors. Of course, only share what you are comfortable sharing with me. You DO NOT need to answer all of the questions. You could spend the whole paper answering one question in depth (with a story, as they say), or you could answer multiple questions at a more vague level if you prefer. 🙂

(2) If you have experience assessing strengths with clients, talk a little about this experience—was it effective/helpful? Were there any challenges? If you have not assessed strengths with clients, is this something you would consider doing in the future? How might it be incorporated into your work with trauma/PTSD?

Grading Criteria

I'm really not looking to take off points for the reflection assignments. I don't have specific rubrics for them, but if you do not seem to be engaging with the prompt or answering the questions, I may take off points. Each reflection assignment is worth
5 points.