quick check

please follow all directions

Discussion

 Post a proposed research problem statement, including your study variables and hypothesis to make your problem statement clear. Explain any ethical considerations you should keep in mind in relation to your research problem statement.  

evidence based


NUR640 Week 1 Assignment 1.2 Page 1

`


Assignment Title: Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO)

Step 1 for your Evidence-Based Practice Mini-Project (Research Proposal)


Assignment Overview:

For your Evidence-Based Practice Mini-Project Step 1, you will submit your PICO question, identify 5 research articles from Levels of Evidence I-V, and write the following for your Mini-Research Proposal: Your introduction, Problem Statement, Purpose Statement, Significance of your Mini-Research Proposal, your Research Question, and which theory supports your Mini-Research Proposal.

Deliverables:

The final copy of your Step1 Mini-Research Proposal assignment is due on or before Sunday at 11:59pm just before Week 2 begins, at the latest. Be sure to use the file naming protocol: NUR640_EBP Step 1_last name_mmddyyyy.

Assignment Details:

For this assignment, you will write part of Section 1 of your Mini-Research Proposal. Use the discernment gained from your Week 1 Discussion of identifying a problem or area of interest and writing a PICO question as a basis for beginning your Section 1. Review Chapter 2 (Manuscript Structure and Content) and Chapter 3 (Writing Clearly and Concisely) from the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.).

Note, you will submit a 2-3 page paper plus your Title Page and Reference Page that clearly identifies the following areas:

1) PICO Question;

2) 5 Research articles with Levels of Evidence of I-IV;

3) Your introduction, problem statement, purpose statement, and significance of your Mini-Research Proposal, along with the theory undergirding your PICO and Problem statement.

PICO Question: Describe the Problem/Population (P); Your Intervention (I); your Comparison (C), and Outcomes (O).

Research Articles (5) between I-IV Levels of Evidence with APA reference citation. Identify the level of evidence of each article after the reference citation that goes at the end of this Assignment submission.

Introduction, Problem Statement, Purpose Statement, and Significance of your Mini-Research Proposal. Your
problem statement provides an overview of your Mini-Research Proposal topic and a clear statement of the need for this Mini-Research Proposal topic. The 5 articles that you have selected should provide rationale for the need for this Mini-Research Proposal. Your
purpose statement justifies the need for your Mini-Research Proposal and is supported in the literature. The
significance of your Mini-Research Proposal is clearly stated and supported by the literature. The
research question is clearly presented. Your selected
theory may be based on pathophysiology, a nurse theory, or from any health-related discipline.

Note: Your Step 1 of the Mini-Research Proposal should have an introduction and summary of what you have written.

Grading: Each part of your Mini-Research Proposal has a grading rubric. All submissions should have a title page and reference page. Each Section of the Mini-Research Proposal will then be added together the Week 5 assignment, which will be graded again with a new rubric that includes your best revision based on detailed weekly instructor feedback. Points will be lost if suggestions are not incorporated into the final Week 5 Submission of your Mini-Research Proposal. (See Week 5 Assignment rubric).

image1.png

image2.jpeg

ASSESSING NEUROLOGICAL SYMPTOMS

 

A 40 year old female presents with complaint of a headache for one week. Reports a “head cold” 3 weeks ago.  Thought it was getting better, but sinus symptoms are back and even worse.

Describes the headache is located across her forehead; feels like pressure behind my eyes and unable to breathe out of nose. Also feels mucus running down the back of throat.  Pain sometimes severe (8/10) but with acetaminophen reduces to moderate (4/10) and occasionally mild (2/10).  Occasional nonproductive cough.  Feels feverish at times; noted frequent sneezing and no appetite. Bending over seems to make the headache worse.  “Acetaminophen improves my headache, but doesn’t take it away.” Taking Sudafed HCL 120 mg every 12 hours, with some relief. Symptoms are worse in the morning – awakes with a headache. Ranges from 2/10 at its best to 8/10. Difficulty with concentrating at job and feels very tired.

Nursing week 5 abstract assignment

Week 5 Abstract, Significance, and Summary

 This week, you will submit the final portions of your paper for review. Please make sure to review all of your instructor's feedback and prepare your research for final submission in week 7.  

Abstract

The abstract is generally used as a searchable, comprehensive overview of your research. When online databases search research, they pull keywords from the abstract. Compose the abstract for your research project. Your abstract should be one page in length, and include the following:

· Describe the research problem and why it is important. 

· Identify the purpose of the study. 

· State the theoretical foundations and/or conceptual frameworks, as appropriate. 

· Summarize the key research question(s). 

· Describe, concisely, the overall research design, methods, and data analysis procedures. 

· Conclude with a statement on the implications for positive social or institutional change.

Your abstract must be a clear and concise overview of your research that would be easily searchable if you were to publish in a journal. 

Significance and Summary 

In 3–4 pages, summarize your study. Provide a summation of evidence (referencing your literature) that the problem is current, relevant, and significant to the discipline. Reiterate the gap in the literature and how your project contributes to social or organizational change in nursing and nursing education.

Within your summary, state the significance of your research by identifying potential contributions of the study that advance knowledge in the discipline. This is an elaboration of what the problem addresses. Provide a strong “take home” message that captures the key essence of your research.

Lastly, describe recommendations for further research that are grounded in the strengths and limitations of the current research as well as the literature you reviewed. Ensure recommendations do not exceed the research boundaries.

Review the rubric for grading criteria.

Points Possible: 50

NURS_692B_DE – NURS 692-B Week 5 Abstract, Significance and Summary Rubric

NURS_692B_DE – NURS 692-B Week 5 Abstract, Significance and Summary Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Abstract

15 to >12.3 pts

Meets Expectations

The abstract is one page in length and describes the research problem and it's importance. Expertly identifies the purpose of the study, the theoretical foundations and/or conceptual frameworks, as appropriate, summarizes the key research question(s) and describes, concisely, the overall research design, methods, and data analysis procedures. The abstract is concluded with a statement on the implications for positive social or institutional change.

12.3 to >11.25 pts

Approaches Expectations

The abstract is one page in length and meets most of the abstract criteria however may be limited in one area or missing key components that deter the abstract from it's intention.

11.25 to >8.85 pts

Falls Below Expectations

The abstract is significantly less than one page in length or it is too long and does not meet most of the abstract criteria. There are significant missing key components that deter the abstract from it's intention.

8.85 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

The abstract is not present or is grossly erroneous.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Significance and Summary

25 to >20.5 pts

Meets Expectations

The significance and summary section includes an overall summary of the project’s main points the significance of the project to the nursing education profession, and recommendations for future research.The summation is 3-4 pages and provides evidence that the problem is current, relevant, and significant to the discipline. The summary reiterates the gap in the literature and how your project contributes to social or organizational change in nursing and nursing education. The significance of the problem is stated and correlated to potential contributions of the study that advance knowledge in the discipline. Provides a strong “take home” message that captures the key essence of your research. The summary concludes with recommendations for further research that are grounded in the strengths and limitations of the current research as well as the literature reviewed.

20.5 to >18.75 pts

Approaches Expectations

The significance and summary section includes an overall summary of the project’s main points the significance of the project to the nursing education profession, however may be limited in detail in some areas. The summation is less than 3 pages and provides some evidence that the problem is current, relevant but the significance to the discipline is questionable. There is not a strong strong “take home” message that captures the key essence of your research.There are limited recommendations for further research that are somewhat grounded in the strengths and limitations of the current research as well as the literature reviewed.

18.75 to >14.75 pts

Falls Below Expectations

The significance and summary section includes an overall summary of the project’s main points but is missing key required components, enough that the meaning of this final section is impeded and does not summarize the research effectively.

14.75 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

The significance and summary section is not included or is severely limited in detail, in so much that it does not contribute to the research paper at all.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Mechanics

7.5 to >6.15 pts

Meets Expectations

Information is well organized and clearly communicated. Assignment is free of spelling and grammatical errors.

6.15 to >5.63 pts

Approaches Expectations

Answers are well written or orally presented throughout, and the information is reasonably organized and communicated. Assignment is mostly free of spelling and grammatical errors.

5.63 to >4.43 pts

Falls Below Expectations

Answers are somewhat organized and lacks some clarity. Contains some spelling and grammatical errors.

4.43 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Answers are not well written or orally presented and lack clarity. Information is poorly organized. Assignment contains many spelling and grammatical errors.

7.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA Format

2.5 to >2.05 pts

Meets Expectations

Follows all the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout.

2.05 to >1.88 pts

Approaches Expectations

Follows length requirement and most of the requirements related to format, source citations, and layout.

1.88 to >1.48 pts

Falls Below Expectations

Follows most of the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout.

1.48 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Does not follow format, length, source citations, and layout requirements.

2.5 pts

Total Points: 50

THE APPLICATION OF DATA TO PROBLEM-SOLVING

THE APPLICATION OF DATA TO PROBLEM-SOLVING

In the modern era, there are few professions that do not to some extent rely on data. Stockbrokers rely on market data to advise clients on financial matters. Meteorologists rely on weather data to forecast weather conditions, while realtors rely on data to advise on the purchase and sale of property. In these and other cases, data not only helps solve problems, but adds to the practitioner’s and the discipline’s body of knowledge.

Of course, the nursing profession also relies heavily on data. The field of nursing informatics aims to make sure nurses have access to the appropriate date to solve healthcare problems, make decisions in the interest of patients, and add to knowledge.

In this Discussion, you will consider a scenario that would benefit from access to data and how such access could facilitate both problem-solving and knowledge formation.

To Prepare:

· Reflect on the concepts of informatics and knowledge work as presented in the Resources.

· Consider a hypothetical scenario based on your own healthcare practice or organization that would require or benefit from the access/collection and application of data. Your scenario may involve a patient, staff, or management problem or gap.

Post a description of the focus of your scenario. Describe the data that could be used and how the data might be collected and accessed. What knowledge might be derived from that data? How would a nurse leader use clinical reasoning and judgment in the formation of knowledge from this experience?

DISCUSSION: PATIENT PREFERENCES AND DECISION MAKING

To Prepare:

  • reflect on a time when you experienced a patient being brought into (or not being brought into) a decision regarding their treatment plan.
  • Review the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute’s Decision Aids Inventory at https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/.
    • Choose “For Specific Conditions,” then Browse an alphabetical listing of decision aids by health topic.
  • After you have chosen a topic (or condition) and a decision aid, consider if social determinants of health were considered in the treatment plan Social determinants of health can affect a patient’s decision as these are conditions in the patient’s environment, such as economic stability, education access, health care access and quality, neighborhood, and social and community context.
  • NOTE: To ensure compliance with HIPAA rules, please DO NOT use the patient’s real name or any information that might identify the patient or organization/practice.

 Post a brief description of the situation you experienced and explain how incorporating or not incorporating patient preferences, social determinants of health, and values impacted the outcome of their treatment plan. Be specific and provide examples and at least 3 references. Then, explain how including patient preferences, social determinants of health, and values might impact the trajectory of the situation and how these were reflected in the treatment plan. Finally, explain the value of the patient decision aid you selected and how it might contribute to effective decision making, both in general and in the experience you described. Describe how you might use this decision aid inventory in your professional practice or personal life.

(Please Note: The underlined “social determinants of health” in the above content is meant to hotlink to the following Walden webpage and content:

Social Determinants of Health – Social Determinants of Health – Academic Guides at Walden University)

Reply to the following (2) Discussions

Please Read the attachment for the instructions

please read

 Decubitus ulcers: origin, classification, and how to avoid them.

 a minimum of 1 pages.  include at least 2 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

 Submission Instructions: 

  • Your assignment will be run through TurnItIn to check for plagiarism. 

D. Saa Critical Care Wk 3 Disc

MY NUMBER ASSIGNED WAS 3 WHICH IS: NIH Stroke Scale

Initial post:Each student will be assigned a number randomly.  Whatever your number is, select the corresponding topic below, then post a minimum of 5 bullet points about the topic.Your bullet points should address key components of the topic, such as what, how, who, & why.  This information should not be basic things you learned in Med/Surg, but rather advanced critical care based. Think about this as a group effort to create a study guide. Use ONLY your textbook, but do not cut & paste from the book.Then create, find, or borrow a test style question about your topic & post at the bottom of your bullet points. The format needs to be multiple choice or select all that apply. Think NCLEX style. Each week include a paragraph with the results from one of your weekly interviews.Discussion post assignments are worth 20 points each as follows: 

  • 5 points for the quality of your bullet points.
  • 5 points for the quality of your question.
  • 5 points for answering the question of a peer as your response.
  • 5 points for the quality of your rationale.
    • Quality is defined as thorough and thoughtful while demonstrating professional level knowledge of the topic.