Judaism


Judaism Discussion

After studying 

Module 3: Lecture Materials & Resources
, as well as reviewing the 

Judaism Resources
 page, discuss the following:

In your reading of 
Chapter 10 – Encountering Judaism: The Way of God’s People as well as the other readings for the week, you have gained a better understanding of central themes of Judaism. As you learned more about the religion, you may have noticed the many similarities that Judaism shares with Christianity as the relationship between the two religions rather unique. Christianity is rooted in Judaism historically, scripturally, liturgically, and even theologically. No two major world religions have so much in common. Below are a handful of the common elements shared by these two religions, however it is important to note that even though these religions share several common elements, they articulate them differently. Last week, we expounded upon how some of these themes are understood in the context of Catholicism and now you will describe how they are understood in Judaism.

Select the two themes  below and present the Jewish teaching on the chosen theme.

· Jewish Understanding of God

· Freedom and Free Will


Each selected theme must:

· Each theme must Be explained in at least two paragraphs

· Incorporate at least 2 direct quotations with accompanying in-text citations from either the required weekly readings or a resource found on the “Judaism Resources” page linked below

presentation

 Next week presentation is intended to cover major cardiovascular diseases (CD). The distribution of the topics for the presentation is as follow: 

 Coronary Heart Disease
Anginas 

** Classification (if there is any)
Pathophysiology
Screening
Prevention
 

250 Nurse Evidence Based Discussion

Due 9/25   12pm EST

250 WORDS not including title and reference APA

 

As you complete the gathering and evaluation of the evidence, it’s important to review the significance and next steps related to EBP.

Consider the following questions in your discussion post:

  • How does a nurse know what (if any) knowledge in a research study is usable for clinical practice?
  • What would a critical thinker look for in the evidence before deciding to change?
  • What influence do credibility and clinical significance have on your decisions to integrate research-based evidence into your practice?

Responses need to address all components of the question, demonstrate critical thinking and analysis, and include peer reviewed journal evidence to support the student’s position.

Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

  All posts should be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource, ideally within the last 5 years. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citations and references must adhere to APA format. 

Diabetes

Using at least 4 current (within the past 5 years), relevant, peer-reviewed resources, create a literature review that does the following:

· Describes the project's topic, resources reviewed, and conclusions of each article.

· Summarizes the principal findings of the research and their relevance to the project's proposed outcomes.

This paper should be at least 2 pages in length and reference

PMHNP

 Research the 3 highest priority Differential Diagnoses, the proposed interventions with rationale and respond to the case.   

Challenges in Practice

Scenario: 

 The radiologist at your hospital reports to the administrator that 30 patients have been diagnosed with brain tumors during the past 2 months. The administrator requests a report detailing the number of patients diagnosed with brain tumors during the past 6 months. However, the radiology department uses a free-text entry for their diagnoses, and their system does not communicate with the larger electronic health record (EHR) system installed at the hospital. You recognize an opportunity to address challenges with the EHR system in your hospital and decide to also write a proposal for a solution to improve your hospital’s EHR system. 

 compose a proposal for how the hospital in the scenario might overcome each of the following challenges related to the scenario:

  • Vocabulary standards
  • Interoperabiliy
  • Workarounds
  • Patient safety
  • Patient privacy and security when pulling reports
  • Recommend a change theory that might assist in your convincing the hospital administration to implement the EHR solution and improvements you propose. Be specific and provide examples.
  • Support your proposal by explaining how the EHR solution might benefit data analysis for the promotion of improved health outcomes.
  • Provide references within 5 years to support your answers.
  • Note: The title page, introduction, summary, and references are in addition to the required page count.

W3R see attachment

Make a follow-up of a student's weekly discussion and respond with your opinion regarding to her post

——You don't have to post this in APA format necessarily, it's just giving feedback to the student .



Jacqueline Kenney

Good Evening Professor,

 

              I work in one of the largest hospital systems in Atlanta. The facility I work for has the bed capacity for 686 patients. The hospital specializes in cardiovascular procedures (the implantation of the LVAD) and transplantation of liver, and kidneys. The hospital attracts people from across the country. People coming from literally every state, and sometimes from out of the country.

            The area where I see the EHR impeding patient care, and again this might be in part, due to end-user negligence, are providers not utilizing the information and data contained within the patient's EHR frequently enough.  We run off a system called EPIC (EHR). I have come to realize most hospitals in the state of Georgia, and other states use EPIC as well.  Embedded within the EPIC system is a hyperlink called Care Everywhere. The Care Everywhere tab allows all providers on the EPIC system to see notes, documentation, tests results, frequency of visits, and more. This data covers every hospital, clinical, urgent care, and office visit the patient has encountered so as long as the facility is on the EPIC system. I believe the shear amount of medical information becomes overwhelming and time consuming to comb through, especially for medical providers who are already seeing numerous patients at the bedside and in specialty offices. 

          Despite medical documentation being readily available to providers across the healthcare spectrum, there seems to be little time for a busy Cardiologist to review necessary documentation from the patient's Pulmonary doctor, or the notes placed from Endocrinology. Often a patient comes for a visit due to CAD, but the patient is also a diabetic with uncontrolled elevated blood glucose. We know one disease process feeds the other, but in spite of the EHR containing valuable patient data, providers are still missing imperative clinical information required to treat the patients holistically. 

          The one department which I see consistently using chart review to coordinate care with patients, providers, and families are RN Case Managers within the hospital setting.  RN Case Managers, and Care Coordinators are responsible for knowing what is missing in the patient continuum of care. The RNCM interfaces with the providers, and assists in providing education to both medical MDs and patients regarding critical clinical information which will advance the clinical process and bring better patient outcomes. McBride & Tietze (2018) discussed unintended harm, or consequences suffered by patients with the implementation of the EHR. One such consequence has to do with physicians required to research, and review copious amounts of previous documentation, as well as being required to spend greater amounts of time entering documentation.  Such time consuming tasks often create information, and important patient data not being read, or documented in an effort to save time, and so providers can physically see more patients. 

 

Resources

                FAAN, S.M.P.R. C., & FAAN, M.T.P.R. F. (2018). 
Nursing Informatics for the Advanced Practice Nurse (2nd ed.). Springer Publishing LLC. 

https://ambassadored.vitalsource.com/books/9780826140555Links to an external site.

           Williams, M. D., Asiedu, G. B., Finnie, D., Neely, C., Egginton, J., Finney Rutten, L. J., & Jacobson, R. M. (2019). Sustainable care coordination: a qualitative study of primary care provider, administrator, and insurer perspectives. 
BMC health services research
19(1), 92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-3916

 Reply

SOAP note CKD

SOAP note follow up chronic kidney disease stage 2

UTI in a 10 years old child

Discussion topic: Pediatric SOAP NOTE about UTI in a 10 years old child

  

Requirements

Ø The discussion must address the topic

Ø Rationale must be provided

Ø Use at least 600 words (no included 1st page or references in the 600 words)

Ø May use examples from your nursing practice

Ø Formatted and cited in current APA 7

Ø Use 3 academic sources, not older than 5 years. Not Websites are allowed.

Ø Plagiarism is NOT permitted

I have attached a sample, the rubric, and the template

discussion

 

  1. After studying the lesson “Nursing Leadership” in Chapter 21 of the textbook (eBook), open a discussion forum by answering the following questions:
  2. What is leadership?
  3. What is a leader?
  4. How does a nurse demonstrate leadership characteristics? Explain.
  5. Do you think Florence Nightingale was a leader in the nursing profession? Why?          Explain.
  6. Describe the following types of leadership: autocratic, democratic, and Laissez-Faire. Give an example of each one within the nursing field.
  7. This topic will be part of class discussion this week (Module 7).
  8. In addition to the eBook, you are required to use at least two more primary references.
  9. Remember APA style when use references “in-text” citation and in the References at the final of your publication.
  10. Submission Instructions:
  • Submit your discussion post by 5:59 PM Eastern on Thursday, October 5th, 2023. 
  • Your initial post should include at least 2 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.
  • Respond to your classmates’ discussion posts by 11:59 PM Eastern on Saturday, October 7th, 2023. Ask a question, and provide a different viewpoint.