Nursing Assignment 2
Please follow directions
Please follow directions
A 53-year-old male patient with complaints of non-specific abdominal pain is admitted to the hospital with hematuria and is undergoing diagnostic testing for bladder cancer.
What do you think nursing contributes to health care? How can a robotic system incorporate the clinical judgment that nurses use? Be as creative as you wish!
If you can, listen to the following audio clip from National Nurses United’s “Insist on a Registered Nurse” campaign:
https://soundcloud.com/national-nurses-united/radio-ad-robocare
While this is an attempt at humor about a serious situation, it drives a fundamental question: What would health care be without nurses?
Minimum of 250 words.
To prepare: the key requirements are to identify a hypothetical practice problem as the focus of an evidence-based quality improvement project; a hypothetical health care setting for the project based on investigating actual sites; stakeholders for project approval and implementation within health care settings; and a presentation outlining the basic steps of a specific framework/model for translating research and evidence to improved practice.
The Assignment:Part 1: Key Project Elements
Complete your p a p e r of 6–8 pages, plus cover page and references page, explaining your investigation of three hypothetical practice sites for an Evidence based practice QI project.
Part 2: Implementation Science Presentation
Complete your PowerPoint presentation of 3–5 slides, plus cover and reference slides, to inform hypothetical stakeholders.
nursing
Dear Students, Health information is data related to medical history.
Health information records include history, lab results, diagnostic information, and notes. It creates data sets that are used for individuals and populations.
Questions:
When thinking about Health Care information and HIT, autonomy is often an ethical issue. What concerns would patients have about their privacy with electronic health records.
How is beneficence and non-maleficence violated with ransomware?
Rubrics:
APA style 7th edition format
Submit it as word document attachments.
Presentation and references pages are required.
turinitin proof
Suggested Project Topics
This assignment will be grading using the below rubric.
CO 3: Determine chemical names and/or chemical formula for diatomic or simple polyatomic compounds and draw a Lewis structure, construct a molecular geometry and determine the polarity for a covalent.
Rubric
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Relationship with Nursing
Ties between the chemistry topic and nursing are well explained and clear.
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Visuals
Group makes great use of visuals (drawings, models, short videos, ect.) to demonstrate points.
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Enthusiasm and Participation
All group members participate to enthusiastically present how their chemistry topic ties to the field of nursing.
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Accuracy
Chemistry used is accurate and well explained. Chemistry and application are woven together well.
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Research
Topic is well supported by APA cited sources (in line or on the same slide).
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Organization
Information is presented using clear and concise language in an organized manner.
Length
Presentation is 10 slides in length
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Citation of Sources
All sources are properly cited.
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Spelling/Grammar
No errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.
Learning Activity Content
1.
Top of Form
During this week's learning activity we will begin to develop your PICCO question.
Choose a topic that you would like to research in nursing. You may use a topic previously used in the assignments for this week.
Develop a literature review abstract list (1 for each source) of 3 or more sources that support this topic. This means you will cite your article and write 1-2 paragraphs on how this research study/article supports your PICO question.
The PICO Question is Due this week and is a required assignment. Submit it with your Literature Review [with this assignment].
Here is a very useful link on how to write a literature review and complete a literature review.
How to write a Literature Review
Please review the rubric prior to submission.
Criteria |
Excellent 100% |
Satisfactory 75% |
Unsatisfactory 50% |
Poor 25% |
Learning activity questions
50 % |
The learning activity questions are answered comprehensively. The word count if applicable has been met, and it is accurate, non-evaluative, coherent, readable, and concise. All the following elements are included: a. The problem or issue you are presented and clearly explained, and b. the author's conclusions are clear and concise are explained. |
The learning activity questions are not answered comprehensively. The word count is 50 words short of meeting the required count, and it is accurate, has some non-cohesive thoughts, readable, and is concise. All the following elements are included: a. The problem or issue you are presented and clearly explained, and b. the author's conclusions are clear and concise are explained. |
The learning activity questions are not answered comprehensively. The word count is 50 words short of meeting the required count, but it is not clear and accurate, has some non-cohesive thoughts, and struggles to be coherent, readable, and concise. All the following elements are included: a. The problem or issue you is not presented and clearly explained, and b. the author's conclusions are not clear and concise are explained. |
The learning activity questions are not answered comprehensively. The word count is more than 50 words short of meeting the required count, but it is not clear and accurate, has some non-cohesive thoughts, and struggles to be coherent, readable, and concise. All the following elements are included: a. The problem or issue you is not presented and clearly explained, and b. the author's conclusions are not clear and concise are explained. |
Grammar, Spelling, APA 25% |
Minimal spelling, APA, and/or grammar mistakes. |
Some spelling, APA, and or grammar mistakes. |
Noticeable spelling, APA, and/or grammar mistakes. |
An unacceptable number of spelling and/or grammar mistakes. |
Reference Page 25% |
All sources 3 are current within 5 years and are cited following APA format. |
At least 1 source is NOT current (within 5 years) but ALL are cited following APA format. |
More than 2 sources are NOT current (within 5 years) and some are cited NOT following APA format. |
All sources are NOT current (within 5 years) and some are cited NOT following APA format. |
|
|
|
|
|
1) Watch the entire scenario. In the scenario assignment, you are asked to reflect on responses to the presented scenario.
2) Fill out the template attached below
3) Compose the last question on the template reflection in a Word document and be sure to address, at a minimum, the following questions:
*Why do you feel the way you do about the issue presented?
*Of the four responses offered in the scenario, which do you think is the most ethical and why?
*Which ethical theory would you use to support your stance? Why does this theory work?
4) Support your conclusions with evidence and specific examples from the textbook, including a minimum of one theory of ethics to defend your stance.
EVIDENCE-BASED PROJECT, PART 4: RECOMMENDING AN EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CHANGE
The collection of evidence is an activity that occurs with an endgame in mind. For example, law enforcement professionals collect evidence to support a decision to charge those accused of criminal activity. Similarly, evidence-based healthcare practitioners collect evidence to support decisions in pursuit of specific healthcare outcomes.
In this Assignment, you will identify an issue or opportunity for change within your healthcare organization and propose an idea for a change in practice supported by an EBP approach.
To Prepare:
· Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you critically appraised in Module 4, related to your clinical topic of interest and PICOT.
· Reflect on your current healthcare organization and think about potential opportunities for evidence-based change, using your topic of interest and PICOT as the basis for your reflection.
· Consider the best method of disseminating the results of your presentation to an audience.
The Assignment: (Evidence-Based Project)
Part 4: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change
Create an 8- to 9-slide
narrated PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:
· Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its culture and readiness for change. (You may opt to keep various elements of this anonymous, such as your company name.)
· Describe the current problem or opportunity for change. Include in this description the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in general.
· Propose an evidence-based idea for a change in practice using an EBP approach to decision making. Note that you may find further research needs to be conducted if sufficient evidence is not discovered.
· Describe your plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation.
· Explain how you would disseminate the results of your project to an audience. Provide a rationale for why you selected this dissemination strategy.
· Describe the measurable outcomes you hope to achieve with the implementation of this evidence-based change.
· Be sure to provide APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer reviewed articles you selected to support your thinking.
· Add a lessons learned section that includes the following:
· A summary of the critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed articles you previously submitted
· An explanation about what you learned from completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template (1-3 slides)
LEARNING RESOURCES
· Hoffman, T. C., Montori, V. M., & Del Mar, C. (2014).
The connection between evidence-based medicine and shared decision makingLinks to an external site.
.
Journal of the American Medical Association, 312(13), 1295–1296. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.10186
· Kon, A. A., Davidson, J. E., Morrison, W., Danis, M., & White, D. B. (2016).
Shared decision making in intensive care units: An American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society policy statementLinks to an external site.
.
Critical Care Medicine, 44(1), 188–201. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000001396
· Opperman, C., Liebig, D., Bowling, J., & Johnson, C. S., & Harper, M. (2016).
Measuring return on investment for professional development activities: Implications for practiceLinks to an external site.
.
Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 32(4), 176–184. doi:10.1097/NND.0000000000000483
· Schroy, P. C., Mylvaganam, S., & Davidson, P. (2014).
Provider perspectives on the utility of a colorectal cancer screening decision aid for facilitating shared decision makingLinks to an external site.
.
Health Expectations, 17(1), 27–35. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00730.xThe Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. (2019).
Patient decision aidsLinks to an external site.
. Retrieved from https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/
Nursinghomeworkdesk.com is a unique service that provides guidance with different types of content. Please rest assured that the service is absolutely legal and doesn’t violate any regulations.
Home
Writing Services
About Us
Pricing
Email:
[email protected]
Phone:
+1 (231)-518-0303