Discussion Post

A theoretical framework provides a rationale for predictions about the relationship among variables. Discuss the variables you will use in your change project and the specific steps that are necessary to implement your change project in your organization.

W6

 

  1. Application of Course Knowledge: Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail.
    • Describe how learning about the history of research ethics impacted your view of biomedical research. 
    • Consider the research you collected for your PICOT question. Discuss steps researchers took to protect the rights of human subjects. What additional measures would you recommend?
    • Describe common disparities in biomedical research. Did you find evidence of disparities in the articles you reviewed for your PICOT question? If so, what were your findings? 

 

  1. Professionalism in Communication: Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.
  2. Wednesday Participation Requirement: Provide a substantive response to the Collaboration Café topic (not a response to a  peer) by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. 

Mod.5 Discussion/APA STYLE/Turnitin-Plagiarism FREE-Pharm

Treatments for Gastrointestinal & Endocrine Disorders Based on Module 5: Lecture Materials & Resources and experience, please answer the following questions:

  1. Describe diagnostic criteria for nausea and vomiting and treatment recommendations
  2. Discuss symptoms of GERD, complications, and drug management
  3. Compare and contrast Crohn’s disease and Ulcerative colitis
  4. Discuss Diabetes, its causes, symptoms, and treatment                                                                                                                                                                                                        Submission Instructions:
  • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in the current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources within the past 5 yrs.
    • Each question must be answered individually as in bullet points.

course textbook Arcangelo, P. V., Peterson, M. A., Wilbur, V., & Reinhold, A. J. (2017)

6-2 Module Six Project Preparation

Follow rubric Verbatim

Textbook link: https://bncvirtual.com/vb_econtent.php?ACTION=econtent&FVENCKEY=AD9EE8D798DCAFC7E76B5FB7C978DD86&j=43766531&sfmc_sub=1597096465&l=23329524_HTML&u=695880241&mid=524003857&jb=40753&utm_term=10242022&utm_source=transactional&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Direct_Ebooks

What to Submit

Your submission should be a 2- to 3-page Word document. Also include a title page. Use 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to APA style.

6-1 Module Six Program Critique

Read rubric Verbatim

Program Critique reading is attached

What to Submit

Your submission should be a 2- to 3-page Word document. Also include a title page. Use 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins. You should include a minimum of two sources. Sources should be cited according to APA style.

Soap 2

A SOAP note is a method of documentation employed by healthcare providers to record and communicate patient information in a clear, structured, and in an organized manner. This assignment will provide students with the necessary tools to document patient care effectively, enhance their clinical skills, and prepare them for their roles as competent healthcare providers.

Instructions:

SOAP is an acronym that stands for Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan. The episodic SOAP note is to be written using the attached template below.

For all the SOAP note assignments, you will write a SOAP note about one of your patients and use the following acronym:

S =Subjective data: Patient’s Chief Complaint (CC).O =Objective data: Including client behavior, physical assessment, vital signs, and meds.A =Assessment: Diagnosis of the patient’s condition. Include differential diagnosis.P =Plan: Treatment, diagnostic testing, and follow up

Click here to access and download the SOAP Note TemplateDownload Click here to access and download the SOAP Note Template

Submission Instructions:

  • Your SOAP note should be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation, and misspellings.
  • You must use the template provided. Turnitin will recognize the template and not score against it.

Module 4 Concept Map

  1. Read Chapter 5 – The Health Care Delivery System in The Future of the Public’s Health in the 21st CenturyLinks to an external site.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK221227/

Download the Concept Map Actions and fill in the six concepts that you found are important to provide equitable healthcare services. (No handwritten assignment will be accepted).

Module 4 discussion

  1. Watch the short video Ethics in Action – Drivers of Migration, Human Trafficking, and Modern SlaveryLinks to an external site..
  2. Choose one of the basic five ethical principles listed below and describe how it applies to the issues in the video:
    1. Autonomy
    2. Justice
    3. Beneficence
    4. Non-maleficence
    5. Fidelity
  3. Write an original post (at least 240 words or more) on your thoughts, feelings and similar experiences. Use at least one reference to support your ideas.

Placenta Acreta and its risks

3-4 paragraph  APA format single spaced, on Placenta accreta and its risks. Watch for AI usage, must be under 8% and must include research information on how placenta accreta is causes and what its risks are. 

Lesson 9 Discussion

  1. Now that you know how to search, appraise, and synthesize the evidence, find an EBP systematic review, guideline, or protocol to help you resolve the proposed problem in your EBP project. 
  2. Use one of the secondary source articles from the EBP group project  (preferable a systematic review).
  3. Title the discussion with the name of your EBP project.
  4. Initial post: Your post should be within a range of 150-200 words.
  5. Write a paragraph synthesizing the following questions:
    1. Identify the variables of interest. Does it has clearly stated objectives with pre-defined eligibility criteria for studies
    2. a systematic search that attempts to identify all studies. Describe the search methods. Keywords, databases, inclusion, exclusion criteria.
    3. Were clinical and methodological similarities between compared studies. Were the studies homogeneous or heterogeneous?
    4. Was the assessment of the validity of the findings of the included studies (e.g. risk of bias)
    5. Were methods for appraising the strength of evidence (level and quality) described.
    6. Were conclusions based on results?

APA Format 7th Edition.