Nursing 9-4
Develop an intervention (your capstone project), as a solution to the patient, family, or population problem you’ve defined.
Develop an intervention (your capstone project), as a solution to the patient, family, or population problem you’ve defined.
Replies two peers with 200 words each one
1.Sensitivity and specificity are measures of the accuracy of a screening test that we use to identify the presence or absence of a particular condition in an individual.
Sensitivity measures the proportion of true positives that are correctly identified by a screening test. In other words, it tells us the percentage of people who have the condition and are correctly identified by the screening test as having it.
Specificity measures the proportion of true negatives that are correctly identified by a screening test. That is, it tells us the percentage of people who do not suffer from the condition and who the screening test correctly identifies as not suffering.
Both sensitivity and specificity are important in determining the accuracy of a screening test, as they inform us about how effective the test is in correctly identifying both positive and negative cases. Ideally, we want a screening test that has high sensitivity and specificity, so that we can accurately identify the presence or absence of the condition being tested.
There are several factors that can affect sensitivity and specificity:
The threshold or cutoff value used to define a positive screening result. The lower the threshold, the more sensitivity increases but specificity decreases, while a higher threshold increases specificity but decreases sensitivity.
Also important is the prevalence of the condition in the population tested. In a population with high prevalence, the positive predictive value of the test may be higher, while in a population with low prevalence, false positive results may be more common.
Characteristics of the population being tested, such as age, sex, and comorbidities, which may influence the accuracy of the test.
It is important to note that sensitivity and specificity are not absolute measures of a test’s accuracy, but rather represent a balance between correctly identifying true positives and true negatives. Therefore, the decision to use a particular screening test should be based on a thorough evaluation of its performance characteristics and its suitability for the population being screened.
Considering the aforementioned aspects of sensitivity and specificity, we will be able to accurately address research studies, achieving better results.
2. Building evidence-based practice requires difficult assessment of diagnostic tests and measures. Sensitivity and specificity are vital parameters in identifying the validity of this important study. Sensitivity measures the ability of a test to properly identify individuals with a specific condition, while specificity gauges the ability to correctly identify individuals without the condition. Understanding these metrics is a fundamental advance study for healthcare and research settings for accurate disease identification and treatment planning. Sensitivity, also known as the true positive rate, measures the proportion of actual positives correctly identified by the test. High sensitivity ensures that individuals with the condition are unlikely to be missed, reducing the chances of false negatives. For instance, in cancer screening, a highly sensitive test detects can even detect early-stage of the cancers, leading to timely interventions and improved outcomes and like this be able to act. Sensitivity is crucial when early detection significantly influences patient prognosis, allowing for prompt medical intervention. On the other hand, specificity, or by other definition the true negative rate, reflects the proportion of individuals without the condition who are correctly identified by the test. High specificity minimizes false positives, confirming that healthy individuals are not unnecessarily subjected to further, potentially invasive, testing or treatments. For example, in HIV testing, high specificity is vital to prevent unnecessary emotional distress and healthcare costs resulting from false-positive results. Specificity is particularly important when a positive test result can lead to significant consequences, such as starting potent treatments or imposing lifestyle changes. There is often a difference between sensitivity and specificity. Increasing sensitivity may decrease specificity and vice versa, leading to a balance dilemma. Reaching to an optimal equilibrium is essential; too much focus on sensitivity might lead to overdiagnosis and overtreatment, while too much specificity might result in missed diagnoses. Applying the right balance will help individuals and it will and varies based on the medical condition, available treatments, and potential consequences of false results.
In summary, sensitivity and specificity are fundamental components in the screening aspects, tests playing a crucial role in evidence-based practice. Understanding and optimizing these parameters are imperative for clinicians and researchers, ensuring that diagnostic tests are trustworthy, leading to improved patient outcomes. By appreciating the balance between sensitivity and specificity, healthcare professionals can make informed choices, enhancing the quality of care and advancing evidence-based medicine.
Please answer the questions below.
Submission Instructions:
1
Week 7: Change Project Final Paper
Your final paper will encompass all assignments you have completed thus far. At this
point, you will have submitted each section individually and a comprehensive rough
draft. You have received extensive feedback. An attempt to incorporate all previous
assignment feedback should be evident.
The paper should be between 20 and 30 pages in length, not including the cover page,
references, and any appendices. It must follow the current APA manual style and
format. Each section of the paper should be clearly identified using proper headings.
The final paper should be professionally written in a manner suitable for publication.
NURS_691B_DE – NURS 691-B Rubric: Culminating Experience Evidence-Based
Change Project Paper Rubic (Final))
NURS_691B_DE – NURS 691-B Rubric: Culminating Experience Evidence-Based Change Project Paper
Rubic (Final))
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Introduction and
Background
15 to >12.3 pts
Meets Expectations
The change project topic is introduced. All
background information is included. Project
importance within the field or significance for
the designated facility is described.
15 pts
2
This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Problem Identification and
Description in PICOT
Format
15 to >12.3 pts
Meets Expectations
Presents a thorough and insightful analysis of the
chosen topic/problem. Describes the problem
thoroughly, including the target population
description and history/background information
at the assigned clinic or hospital. The significance
and applicability to nursing is included and well
presented. Includes an appropriate topic
identification related to an advanced practice
nursing issue or practice problem of concern.
Population is fully defined and present in the
research question. Includes specific
interventions, identifies comparisons, and
presents appropriate outcomes in a timely
manner for the question. Overall, the question is
well-built using the PICOT format.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome Critical
Appraisal/Literature
Review
18 to >14.76 pts
Meets Expectations
The minimum requirement of peer-reviewed
articles, books, or limited non-research literature
(tool kits or standardized procedures) are
present. Literature is supported by scientific
evidence that is credible and timely. Subtopics
are used to support the main topic. In-text
citations are present and correctly formatted.
Presents a thorough and insightful analysis of
significant findings related to the change project
topic. Ideas are synthesized and professionally
sound and creative. Insightful and
comprehensive conclusions and solutions are
present.
18 pts
3
This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome Project
Aims, Values, and Desired
Outcomes
18 to >14.76 pts
Meets Expectations
The project, aims, values, and desired outcomes
are well-developed. They are clear and thorough.
Aims include examples of projected features and
functions. Values include implementation
benefits for specific stakeholders. Desired
outcomes state the purpose, have a quality
focus, and describe the benefits that will occur
as a result of implementation.
18 pts
This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Theoretical Framework
18 to >14.76 pts
Meets Expectations
Identifies independent theories or conceptual
models that relate to the change project topic
and describes how they will be applied to the
change project. Thoroughly discusses how each
element of the phenomenon applies to the
framework. Clearly applies each element of the
theory to the elements of the phenomenon
under study. Develops the rationale for the
sample selection criteria, and expertly discusses,
analyzes, and critiques pertinent research that
uses the framework.
18 pts
4
This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Intervention
18 to >14.76 pts
Meets Expectations
Provides keen insight into obstacles and
proposes sound, creative solutions or
interventions based on the literature review
findings. Expertly compares other views on the
problem and solutions with detail. Uses
examples to thoroughly address the FNP role in
the intervention and discusses implications for
clinical practice. Thoughtfully discusses the
implications of the change project and its
significance to the nursing profession and filling
gaps in knowledge. Accurately categorizes and
thoroughly explains specific methods of data
collection to be used. Explains in detail how data
will be analyzed and used. Provides a sound
justification for subject selection and sampling
procedure. Accurately and thoroughly describes
potential limitations to data collection and
control.
18 pts
This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Recommendations and
Conclusion
18 to >14.76 pts
Meets Expectations
Provides an insightful and thorough summary of
the project, main points, and details the
significance of the project to the advanced
practice nursing profession. Provides detailed
and creative recommendations for future
research and implications for clinical practice.
Discusses limitations of the study in detail.
Suggests specific directions for future research.
Insightfully considers changes in theoretical
construct and provides reasonable and creative
suggestions for public policy and/or changes in
educational practice. Expertly ties the theoretical
framework to the overall product.
18 pts
5
This criterion is linked to a
Learning Outcome
Mechanics and APA
30 to >24.6 pts
Meets Expectations
Writing is clear, concise, formal, and organized.
Information is well organized and clearly
communicated. The assignment is free of spelling
and grammatical errors. All the requirements
related to format, length, source citations, and
layout are followed. A complete reference page is
included and formatted using correct APA format. If
applicable, appendices and tables are complete and
appropriate.
30 pts
Total Points: 150
Using this required reading: Covid-19 and the Need for Health Care Reform (King, 2020) NEJM .
Identify 1 flaw in the US healthcare system that was made evident during the pandemic, and 1 innovation during the pandemic that improved health care.
Please give 3 scientific citations
Case Study #1 – Cardiac
This case study is meant to be completed individually. Please place questions and answers into a Word document and upload into the drop box when complete. APA formatting is not necessary, but you must cite your work and avoid copy/pasting from any source…paraphrase!
Mr. Jones is a 52-year-old obese man with a medical history of gastric reflux and degenerative arthritis. He arrives at the emergency department with his wife. They had been to dinner and a movie. During the movie Mr. Jones began experiencing excruciating chest pain that radiated to his jaw and left arm. He appears short of breath and diaphoretic. He reaches the registration window when he suddenly collapses. The nurses place him on a stretcher. He has no pulse, and the monitor reveals ventricular tachycardia. He was successfully converted to sinus rhythm after one minute of CPR and one defib/shock at 300 joules.
Mr. Jones regains consciousness after his rhythm converts. He has a blood pressure of 130/92, a heart rate of 112, and a respiratory rate of 24. O2 is immediately started at 3 liters/minute. Three 18 g IV’s are started, lab work is drawn (CPK-MB, Troponin, CBC, PT, PTT, type and screen & Chem 21) and a 12-lead EKG is preformed. He still complains of chest pain (8/10) and nausea. Sublingual NTG 1/150 gr is given. The 12-lead EKG reveals sinus tachycardia, a PR interval of 0.24, and 3 mm ST-segment elevation in leads V2, V3, & V4.
After being admitted to the CCU Mr. Jones complains of chest pain continuing at 8/10. Mr. Jones is given IV morphine 4mg and a nitroglycerin gtt. This drip was started 10 mcg/min and titrated up every 3-5 minutes until the pain was relieved at 50 mcg/min. His blood pressure drops to 84/40. He is pale and diaphoretic. He is prepared for a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and taken to the cardiac cath lab.
Questions
Instructions: Select one of the topic mentioned below and discuses filling the attached form.
Topics:
Pneumonia in 12 years old
Requirements
Ø The discussion must address the topic
Ø Rationale must be provided
Ø Use at least 600 words (no included 1st page or references in the 600 words)
Ø May use examples from your nursing practice
Ø Formatted and cited in current APA 7
Ø Use 3 academic sources, not older than 5 years. Not Websites are allowed.
Ø Plagiarism is NOT permitted
due @10am 11-12-23
Based on the YMH Boston Vignette 5 video, post answers to the following questions:
Then, address the following. Your answers to these prompts do not have to be tailored to the patient in the YMH Boston video.
Support your response with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources and explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Attach the PDFs of your sources.
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to discuss the healthcare policy of the APN profession and how Transformational Leadership can help to influence policy changes. This week’s assignment focuses on the APN as a Health Policy Leader, one of the nine NONPF NP competencies. Students will analyze how health policy may affect NP practice and how Transformational Leadership can help to influence policy changes.
Preparing the Discussion
Criteria for Content
· Explanation of how healthcare policy can impact the advanced practice nurse profession
· Explanation of why advocacy is considered an essential component of the advance practice nurse's role
· Discuss the four pillars of Transformational leadership and the effect they may have on influencing policy change
· A scholarly resource must be used for EACH discussion question each week.
Nursinghomeworkdesk.com is a unique service that provides guidance with different types of content. Please rest assured that the service is absolutely legal and doesn’t violate any regulations.
Home
Writing Services
About Us
Pricing
Email:
[email protected]
Phone:
+1 (231)-518-0303