Clinical Decision Support Poster

Read the following scenario. 

Your facility received the flowing performance data after implementing a clinical decision support system (CDSS). The goal is to have 100% compliance with CDSS use.  

  • CDSS use among providers was 81.4% 
    • 76% of providers approved of the newly implemented CDSS 
    • Cited reasons for not using CDSS included mistrust of the system and a fear of potential diagnostic errors 

Based on the above performance data and metrics, design an interprofessional educational poster to mitigate the mistrust of the proposed CDSS and help increase compliance. Address the following requirements. 

Include the following sections in the poster (detailed criteria listed below and in the grading rubric): 

  1. Problem Identification  
    1. Identify the intended audience.  
    2. Present the concern. 
    3. Use the provided performance data. 
  2. Benefits 
    1. Discuss at least three benefits of using CDSS.  
    2. Include statistical data supporting CDSS use.   
    3. Provide an in-text citation from one scholarly source to support your writing. 
  3. Risks 
    1. Describe at least three risks associated with bypassing the use of alerts in the CDSS.  
    2. Provide an in-text citation from one scholarly source to support your writing. 
  4. Strategies  
    1. Provide at least three strategies for providers to increase the use of CDSS.  
    2. Provide an in-text citation from one scholarly source to support your writing. 
  5. Reflection 
    1. Reflect on your learning and consider how the knowledge will improve your effectiveness as an advanced practice nurse.   
    2. Discuss how you may use this tool in your practice. 
  6. Presentation Format 
    1. Ensure the poster is professional in language, tone, and appearance. 
    2. Ensure the poster is well organized and balanced spatially including words and graphics (if used). 

      Include the required information in the appropriate section of the Clinical Decision Support Poster template. 

  7. Use APA in-text citations and complete references to support your writing.
  8. Follow APA rules for grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation consistent with formal, scholarly writing. 

Implementation Plan

Nurse practitioner APRN health related in primary care setting treating chronic diseases.

Research Analysis

 Conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following:

  • Your topic of interest.
  • A correctly formatted APA citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details.
  • Identify a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.
  • Analysis of the article using the “Research Analysis Matrix” section of the template
  • Write a 1-paragraph justification stating whether you would recommend this article to inform professional practice.
  • Write a 2- to 3-paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following:
    • Describe your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.
    • Identify at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.
    • Identify at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research

WK 6 DIS. DATA

SOAP NOTE

 

  • Review the Focused SOAP Note template, which you will use to complete this Assignment. There is also a Focused SOAP Note Exemplar provided as a guide for Assignment expectations.
  • Review the video, Case Study: Sherman Tremaine. You will use this case as the basis of this Assignment. In this video, a Walden faculty member is assessing a mock patient. The patient will be represented onscreen as an avatar.
  • Consider what history would be necessary to collect from this patient.
  • Consider what interview questions you would need to ask this patient.

The Assignment

Develop a focused SOAP note, including your differential diagnosis and critical-thinking process to formulate a primary diagnosis. Incorporate the following into your responses in the template:

  • Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomology to derive your differential diagnosis? What is the duration and severity of their symptoms? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning in life? 
  • Objective: What observations did you make during the psychiatric assessment?  
  • Assessment: Discuss the patient’s mental status examination results. What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses with supporting evidence, and list them in order from highest priority to lowest priority. Compare the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5-TR criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.
  • Plan: What is your plan for psychotherapy? What is your plan for treatment and management, including alternative therapies? Include pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments, alternative therapies, and follow-up parameters, as well as a rationale for this treatment and management plan. Also incorporate one health promotion activity and one patient education strategy.
  • Reflection notes: What would you do differently with this patient if you could conduct the session again? Discuss what your next intervention would be if you were able to follow up with this patient. Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), health promotion, and disease prevention, taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).
  • Provide at least three evidence-based, peer-reviewed journal articles or evidenced-based guidelines that relate to this case to support your diagnostics and differential diagnoses. Be sure they are current (no more than 5 years old).

By Day 7 of Week 5

Submit your Focused SOAP Note.

Nursing Homework question 330

Nursing Assignment 2

Attached

Nursing Assignment 1

Attached 

SOAP note 1

Create a discussion of

 

/: It is vital that nursing practice be guided by theories or framework. Select and discuss a Middle Range Theory that would be instrumental in the development of your proposed quality improvement project.

Following the guidelines bellow.

Use at least 500 words, APA 7 format and scholarly references NO older than  5 years old.

The possible project theme is: Determine the effectiveness of antineuropathic such as Gabapentin and pregabalin on the treatment of lumbar radiculopathy instead opioids as a first line treatment

Participation Requirements

The student must answer the graded discussion with a substantive reply to the graded discussion question(s)/topic(s) posted by the course instructor by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time of each week. Two scholarly sources references are required, unless stated otherwise by your professor. 

The student provides a substantive response to the discussion question or topic on Wednesday day and posts a minimum of two additional responses to peers on another day(s). 

Remember that a new discussion rubric was approved by the professors, committee members, and a majority of the students. Please review the rubric before posting to ensure a maximum of points. 

Here are the categories of the new discussion rubric:

Initial Post relevance to the topic of discussion, applicability, and insight. (20%)

Quality of Written Communication Appropriateness of audience and words choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic, and varied. Grammar, spelling, punctuation. (20%)

Inclusion of DNP essentials explored in the discussion as well as the role-specific competencies as applicable.(10%)

Rigor, currency,  and relevance of the scholarly references. (Use articles that are below 5 years). (20%)

Peer & Professor Responses. The number of responses, quality of response posts. (20%)

Timeliness of the initial post and the answers to the peers. (10%)