Theoretical and Scientific Foundations of Nursing
TRANSLATION MODELS AND FRAMEWORKS
TRANSLATION MODELS AND FRAMEWORKS
Assessment 2
Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources
Instructions-Develop a 2-4 page scholarly paper in which you describe a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis, and then identify and analyze credible evidence that could be used as the basis for applying EBP to the issue.
Introduction
The goal of using evidence-based research findings is to enhance safety and quality of patient care and ensure optimal outcomes are achieved. It is not uncommon to hear a nurse say, “why change it as we’ve always done it this way.” However, this is no longer acceptable in today's practice environment. The profession of nursing has evolved, and the expectation is that the professional nurse has a scientific foundation to support the care that is provided. As the profession of nursing continues to evolve and engage in health care transformation, baccalaureate-prepared nurses are expanding taking on leadership roles that include incorporating EBPs. To be able to do this, the nurse needs to understand the criteria and makes a resource credible, as this is crucial when deciding if the research is valid and reliable for implementation into health care settings. The nurse will need to incorporate the use of evidence-based practice models. EBP models are designed to assist the nurse in developing a plan to gather evidence to answer a practice problem or question. It is a systematic approach to direct the user to incorporate scholarly findings into current practice. These EBP models lead the nurse through the decision-making process of evaluating the literature to determine the best practice evidence for the practice issue or question.
It would be an excellent choice to complete the Vila Health Determining the Credibility of Evidence activity prior to developing the report. The activity is a media simulation that offers an opportunity to review a scenario and work on determining the credibility of presented evidence. These skills will be necessary to complete Assessment 2 successfully. This media simulation is one potential source of context on which to base your assessment submission. This will take just a few minutes of your time and is not graded.
Professional Context
As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will be responsible for locating and identifying credible and scholarly resources to incorporate the best available evidence for the purposes of enhancing clinical reasoning and judgement skills. When reliable and relevant evidence-based findings are utilized, patients, health care systems, and nursing practice outcomes are positively impacted.
Scenario For this assessment, you may choose from the following options as the context for the quality or safety issue or chosen diagnosis/health issue for researching and completing this assessment:
· The specific diagnosis/health issue you identified in your previous assessment.
· The simulation Vila Health: Determining the Credibility of Evidence.
· A personal practice experience in which a sentinel event occurred.
Instructions- The purpose of this analysis is to better understand what constitutes credibility of journal articles as well as websites. The role of the baccalaureate-prepared nurse in incorporating evidence-based research continues to growth in clinical practice. As quality improvement (QI) measures to reduce safety risks continue to be emphasized, the need for evidence-based models and evidence-based templates is growing. This type of systematic approach to incorporating evidence-based findings allows nurses to make clinical and operational decisions based upon the best available evidence. When the most up-to-date evidence-based findings are utilized, patient-centered care improves outcomes and enhances the patient experience.
Below is a quick review table of several well-known Evidence-Based Practice Models used to guide exploration:
Evidence-Based Practice Models |
Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice |
Stetler Model |
Ottawa Model |
PARiHS (Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services) Model |
ACE (Academic Center for Evidence-Based Practice) Star Model |
ARCC (Advancing Research and Clinical Practice Through Close Collaboration) Mode |
John Hopkins Model |
KTA (Knowledge-to-Action) Model |
For this assessment:
· Explain the criteria that should be used when determining the credibility of journal articles as well as websites.
· Support your explanations with references to the literature or research articles that describe criteria that should be used to determine credibility.
· Your identification and determination of credibility should be done within the context of your chosen scenario for this assessment. For example, if you choose to use the provided Vila Health scenario, your initial identification of resources should be of resources that will best help address the presented issue. However, if you are locating resources to help provide evidence-based care for the diagnosis/health care issue you identified in the first assessment, you may want to begin your literature and evidence search from the databases that were identified. Any of the three scenario options are acceptable. So, pick the one that most interests you.
Be sure to address the following in this assessment, which correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so that you will know what is needed for a distinguished score.
· Describe a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis, that could benefit from an evidence-based approach.
· Explain criteria that should be considered when determining credibility of resources such as journal articles and websites.
· Analyze the credibility and relevance of evidence and resources within the context of a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis.
· This is where you are selecting the specific resources to help address the issue in your chosen scenario.
· Identify the Evidence-Based Practice model and explain the importance of incorporating credible evidence into the EBP model used to address a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis/health care issue. Review the literature below and choose the appropriate model for your diagnosis/health care issue.
·
Selecting a model for evidence-based practice changes. [PDF]
and
Evidence-Based Practice Models
help explain the various evidence-based nursing models.
· Communicate using writing that is clear, logical, and professional with correct grammar and spelling using current APA style.
Additional Requirements
Your assessment should meet the following requirements:
·
Length of submission:
2-4-page scholarly paper, this does not include the APA-formatted title page and reference list.
·
Number of references:
Cite 3-5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than five years old.
·
APA formatting:
References and citations are formatted according to current APA style.
Portfolio Prompt: Remember to save the final assessment to your ePortfolio so that you may refer to it as you complete the final capstone course.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:
· Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision.
· Explain criteria that should be considered when determining credibility of resources such as journal articles and websites.
· Analyze the credibility and relevance of evidence and resources within the context of a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis.
· Competency 3: Apply an evidence-based practice model to address a practice issue.
· Identify an evidence-based practice model (such as Iowa, Stetler, John Hopkins, etc.) and explain the importance of incorporating credible evidence into an EBP model used to address a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis/health care issue.
· Competency 4: Plan care based on the best available evidence.
· Describe a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis, that could benefit from an evidence-based approach.
· Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.
· Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
· Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.
Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated
CRITERIA |
NON-PERFORMANCE |
BASIC |
PROFICIENT |
DISTINGUISHED |
Describe a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis, that could benefit from an evidence-based approach. |
Explain criteria that should be considered when determining credibility of resources such as journal articles and websites.
Analyze the credibility and relevance of evidence and resources within the context of a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis.
Identify an evidence-based practice model (such as John Hopkins, Stetler, Iowa, etc.) and explain the importance of incorporating credible evidence into an EBP model used to address a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis/health care issue.
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.
PLEASE RESPOND IN 50 WORDS OR MORE TO THE FOLLOWING:
1. What staffing model is implemented at the facility where you work? What would you recommend for modifying the staffing model where you work, what is you recommendation based on and how would you implement the change? (Support your thoughts/ideas with academic literature OR required readings)
The staffing model the facility where I work is a nursing home. We use a census as our staffing model. On my floor there is a total of 23 rooms and 2 clients per room. Most of the time we are short staffed, and as a result there are only 2 nurses and we each have 23 patients sometimes less if patients get discharged. Per facility each nurse is suppose to have 9 patients. When dividing patients among nurses I think it is important to take into account patient acuity, some patients require more intense care than others. Meaning if the patients are equally divided the workload may not be. I believe that it is important to talk to your coworkers about this concern to prevent placing patients at risk and create a positive environment where the workload is shared. A lot of times coworkers are not willing to change assignments and that is where I think the unit manager should step in. To fix this problem more staff should be hired to keep the 9:1 ratio and the unit nurse should review assignments, before they are given. Most nurses experience substantial fatigue, with high acuity patients having an overall greater impact. We recommend that NPAs shall contain fewer high acuity patients than lower acuity patients. Additionally, The OFER acute fatigue scale (OPER-AF) suggests that assignments should contain no more than five patients to mitigate fatigue (Mollica and Schwerha, 2021).
Reference
Mollica, & Schwerha, D. (2021). Exploring the Relationship between Patient Acuity, Patient Assignments and Fatigue among Nurses. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 65(1), 1200–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181321651016
Find and read the instrutions for completing the Advocacy Letter under the Assignments tab.
Identify 1 public health issue that you think it is important for nurses to advocate for. Why do you think it is important, what change woudl you like to see take place, and who would you direct your advocacy efforts to in order to make that change?
Please give 3 scientific citations
please find attached the instructions
Post + 2 replies
In this module, you begin laying the foundation for your academic and professional success. Your efforts begin with a vision that includes your own definition of success. Your vision may vary from those of your colleagues, but this does not mean you have to take these first steps alone.
Walden University and the College of Nursing also have a vision and mission, which include helping you to make your own vision a reality. Members of your new academic community, such as faculty, support teams, and fellow students, can also be helpful. Current practitioners and other member of the professional community can also help you to clarify your vision.
This Module’s Discussion asks you to consider how the Walden mission and vision as well as the College of Nursing’s mission and vision apply to your professional and academic goals. You will also begin to identify individuals and teams who can help you along the way as you begin designing the “blueprint”—your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan—that will guide you toward your own vision for academic and professional success. Finally, you will explain the importance of networking and how it can help you achieve your professional and academic goals.
see attachment
For this assignment you will be asked to apply course concepts and learn to develop one Literature Review Table that includes 2 articles.
Please use the Literature Review Template provided within the course content and the evidence rating scale adapted from Melnyk found in course content. There is a video explaining how to complete the table in your course content.
Will I be adding this assignment to the final paper? Yes! The completed Literature Review Table from this week will be used again in the Appendix of your research paper (future assignment).
Will I need to create new literature review tables again for the final paper? No-this is the only assignment you’ll use the table format for. You will summarize 5 additional research articles in the Findings section of your Research Review, so please save those for the future.
Key Information for this assignment:
· You should not copy information from the research you obtain. All information from the research should be paraphrased in your own words (less than 6 words in one sentence should match). Plagiarism checkers should result in less than 10% for the literature review tables.
· All Searches for your Research Review must be completed through the Minnesota State University, Mankato library. Online searches will not be accepted with the exception of Google Scholar. Supply a pdf of your 2 full text articles in the drobox with your literature review table. Do not send links.
· A Data Search Table must be submitted with the Literature Review Assignment and is worth 5 points. Please provide a screen shot of one of your key term searches within the library databases.
Criteria |
Possible Points |
Points Earned |
Clarification/Instructions |
Article title, author, and date is listed in APA format and is current (not older than 5 years) |
2 |
List the reference as a citation in the text would be cited. Include the reference in the reference section of the paper. |
|
Purpose of article is clear and paraphrased from the article |
2 |
Why was the research conducted? What was the goal /discovery that researcher was trying to achieve |
|
Sample size of study article used is stated and numeric values are given (when applicable) |
2 |
N=total number n=subset |
|
Study Design is clearly stated, and level of evidence is provided correctly (Evidence Rating Pyramid adapted from Melnyk in course content) Strongest, stronger, strong, moderate, weak, weakest |
5 |
Include design Quantitative, qualitative design, meta-analysis: retrospective chart review, surveys, etc. Where does this fall Evidence pyramid Melnyk? |
|
Variables/measurement included briefly; reliability of measurement data is included |
4 |
Statistical test used for quantitative; qualitative may use pain score, survey, depression rating scale etc. |
|
Results/findings are clear and statistical significance is included (for example p value) |
5 |
Findings should have an associated statistical value if quantitative, if qualitative may have results of response to treatment 26 had pain relieved vs 13 did not…. |
|
Implications of research for nursing practice and how they apply to or support your research topic Should include limitations |
3 |
Did this article support your PICO? Did it lead you to search in a different direction? Does it demonstrate that there is not enough research to support a practice change |
|
Correct APA format, free of spelling and grammatical errors |
2 |
Follow APA for listing authors Page 286 7th ed. |
|
Includes Data Search Table completed with search terms and screen shot of one search from table |
5 |
||
Total |
30 |
KINE 4354 Public Health Advocacy and Leadership
Assignment 4.1: Advocacy Action Plan Part 2: PEST Analysis
Adapted from:
Sample Templates
,
MindTools PEST Analysis Worksheet
, and
University of Bridgeport Career Development Timeline
Instructions
Use the template below as a worksheet/workspace. The question prompts provided are intended to help you to gain a better understanding of the public health issue or need associated with your advocacy action plan. As you complete this template, you are allowed to make informal notes, use bullet points and copy and past links to websites, articles and other resources that will help you to better identify factors related to your advocacy action plan.
As you complete this template, please keep in mind the following:
· Although it is important to consider macro-level factors (i.e., what is happening at the societal level), for the purposes of this assignment you are asked to place more emphasis on micro-level factors (i.e., what is happening at the community level).
· Although all questions may not apply to your advocacy action plan, be sure to answer each question under all four categories (Political, Economic, Socio-Cultural, & Technology).
Template Components
Step 1: Identify the
Political, Economic, Socio-Cultural and Technological Aspects of the Proposed Change in Your Advocacy Action Plan
KINE 4354 Assignment 4.1: Advocacy Action Plan Part II: PEST Analysis |
|||
Factor |
Opportunity |
Threat |
|
POLITICAL |
|||
Political factors to consider: · · · · · · · |
|||
Factor |
Opportunity |
Threat |
|
ECONOMIC |
|||
Economic factors to consider: · · · |
|||
Factor |
Opportunity |
Threat |
|
SOCIO-CULTURAL |
|||
Socio-Cultural factors to consider: · · · · · · |
|||
Factor |
Opportunity |
Threat |
|
TECHNOLOGICAL |
|||
Technological factors to consider: · · · · |
|||
Step 2: BRAINSTORM OPPORTUNITIES Now that you have identified some of the changes that are taking place in the proposed setting for your advocacy action plan, look at each of those changes and brainstorm the potential OPPORTUNITIES that might be available for you or for the organization which you are proposing the advocacy effort for. |
|||
Potential Opportunities for Your Advocacy Action Plan |
|||
1. |
|||
2. |
|||
3. |
|||
Step 3: BRAINSTORM THREATS Now think about the changes and think about how some of those might be barriers to the implementation of your advocacy action plan. How might you plan in a manner that the potential threats might be minimized, or avoided? |
|||
Potential Threats for Your Advocacy Action Plan |
|||
1. |
|||
2. |
|||
3. |
|||
Step 4: Notes for TAKING ACTION Now it is time to TAKE ACTION! You will take this next step in Assignment 6.1 as you write up your final plan. Use the section below to write your main takeaways as you start to develop the main sections of your advocacy action plan. |
|||
My Advocacy Action Plan Notes: |
Nursinghomeworkdesk.com is a unique service that provides guidance with different types of content. Please rest assured that the service is absolutely legal and doesn’t violate any regulations.
Home
Writing Services
About Us
Pricing
Email:
[email protected]
Phone:
+1 (231)-518-0303