informatics

The table below gives some operational statistics for two hospitals located in the same community. Use the table to answer the following questions.

  1. Calculate the following measures for each hospital (wherever appropriate, calculate the measure for each pay type). Discuss the meaning and significance of each measure and point out the differences between the two hospitals.
    1. Hospital capacity
    2. ALOS
    3. Occupancy rate
  2. Operationally, which hospital is performing better? Why?
  3. Do you think the nonprofit hospital is meeting its community benefit obligations in exchange for its tax-exempt status? Explain.
  4. Do you think the hospitals have a problem with excess capacity? If so, what would you recommend? In your answer to this question, please consider how hospital governance may impact the ability of an administrator to make changes.

5 cl

 

discuss a very brief description (one paragraph for the group session– do NOT include the actual 12-steps) to include the following: 

Official name of the program or group you observed.

PLEASE CLICK ON LINKS TO ANSWER QUESTIONS

Assignment: National Patient Safety Goal

This assignment will be done in the classroom with discussion to follow.

1.  Read the following chapter from the book, “Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses” and provide a brief overview.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2681/

2.  List the National Patient Safety Goals from the Joint Commission’s website appropriate to the long-term care environment and what precautions should the nurse take relative to EACH safety goal? 

https://www.jointcommission.org/-/media/tjc/documents/standards/national-patient-safety-goals/2022/npsg_chapter_alc_jan2022.pdf

3.  From the book, “Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses,” select one other chapter to read and provide a brief overview.  Apply the main concepts to the long-term care facility environment.  This could be a situation from work or from school or a personal experience. 

http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/nurseshdbk/

4.  Select a Speak Up brochure developed by The Joint Commission. Follow this link to the proper website: https://www.jointcommission.org/topics/speak_up_campaigns.aspx and answer the following questions.

a.  Identify the brochure you chose and the demographic it applies to. Who else can utilize this information?

b.  Why is the brochure you chose important?

c.  What was done well? What could be improved?

d.  How will patient safety be improved from the chosen brochure?

e.  Discuss how current nursing or healthcare-related research supports the information presented in the brochure.

Title

Assignment:  National Patient Safety Goal

Put X in box to correspond with the SLO (s)

Put X in box to correspond with the Competency (s)

Knowledge/Practice/Ethical Comportment

K

P

E

Student Learning Outcome(s)

Patient-Centered Care

Communication Skills

 

Nursing Process

Learning Needs

Technology

Documentation

Informatics

Nursing Judgment

Prioritization

Nursing Judgment

Professionalism

Professionalism

Ethical/Legal

Quality Improvement

Patient Care Concerns

Systems

Safety

x

Patient Complications

Safe Nursing

x

x

x

Teamwork/Collaboration

Communication

Conflict Recognition 

Managing Care 

Managing Care of the Individual Patient

Assign/Monitor 

Where should this assignment be used:

Classroom

X

Clinical Setting

X

Independent Study

X

Online/Web Based

X

Skills Lab

Simulation

 

Revised from Linda Caputi © (What type of assignment is this?)

Patient Care Assignment

Non-Patient Care Assignments

Patient Care

The assignments are related to the student while providing patient care in the clinical setting.
Example:  Concept mapping care for one or multiple patients. 

Thinking Focused
Assignments encourages critical thinking and clinical reasoning and teaches students to think like a nurse.

Patient Focused

The student focuses on specific aspects of patient care such as safety, falls, diabetes, other diseases, etc.

Systems Focused

Assignments help the student understand the clinical world, the nurse’s work therein, and the effect of the system on the nurse and the patient.
Example:  How the system completes medication administration from order to delivery to patient.  

x

x

x

week 2

Discussion Topic

Discussion Board Week 2

Genitourinary

A 25-year-old woman presents for care and reports a 2-day history of burning with urination, urinary frequency, and feeling as though she is not emptying her bladder completely. She is sexually active with the same male partner for the past 4 months and is using a progesterone IUD for contraception. 

Her past medical and surgical histories are negative, and she has no known drug allergies (NKDA). 

She denies fever, chills, vaginal discharge, concerns about the IUD, or previous urinary infections or problems.

Questions

  1. What would you do for her during today’s visit? Assessment, labs, etc.
  2. Based on the patient’s clinical presentation, what is the clinical diagnosis chosen for this visit?

Please answer using the SOAP format

Please follow your 7th edition APA guidelines for discussion board postings. Please post an initial post and post 2 responses to your peers within the course by Sunday by 11:59 PM.

DB

 

The Assignment (2-3 pages):

Personal Leadership Philosophies

Develop and submit a personal leadership philosophy that reflects what you think are characteristics of a good leader. Use the scholarly resources on leadership you selected to support your philosophy statement. Your personal leadership philosophy should include the following:

  • A description of your core values.
  • A personal mission and vision statement.
  • An analysis of your CliftonStrengths Assessment summarizing the results of your profile
  • A description of two key behaviors that you wish to strengthen.
  • A development plan that explains how you plan to improve upon the two key behaviors you selected and an explanation of how you plan to achieve your personal vision. Be specific and provide examples.

quick check

please follow all directions

Discussion

 Post a proposed research problem statement, including your study variables and hypothesis to make your problem statement clear. Explain any ethical considerations you should keep in mind in relation to your research problem statement.  

evidence based


NUR640 Week 1 Assignment 1.2 Page 1

`


Assignment Title: Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO)

Step 1 for your Evidence-Based Practice Mini-Project (Research Proposal)


Assignment Overview:

For your Evidence-Based Practice Mini-Project Step 1, you will submit your PICO question, identify 5 research articles from Levels of Evidence I-V, and write the following for your Mini-Research Proposal: Your introduction, Problem Statement, Purpose Statement, Significance of your Mini-Research Proposal, your Research Question, and which theory supports your Mini-Research Proposal.

Deliverables:

The final copy of your Step1 Mini-Research Proposal assignment is due on or before Sunday at 11:59pm just before Week 2 begins, at the latest. Be sure to use the file naming protocol: NUR640_EBP Step 1_last name_mmddyyyy.

Assignment Details:

For this assignment, you will write part of Section 1 of your Mini-Research Proposal. Use the discernment gained from your Week 1 Discussion of identifying a problem or area of interest and writing a PICO question as a basis for beginning your Section 1. Review Chapter 2 (Manuscript Structure and Content) and Chapter 3 (Writing Clearly and Concisely) from the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.).

Note, you will submit a 2-3 page paper plus your Title Page and Reference Page that clearly identifies the following areas:

1) PICO Question;

2) 5 Research articles with Levels of Evidence of I-IV;

3) Your introduction, problem statement, purpose statement, and significance of your Mini-Research Proposal, along with the theory undergirding your PICO and Problem statement.

PICO Question: Describe the Problem/Population (P); Your Intervention (I); your Comparison (C), and Outcomes (O).

Research Articles (5) between I-IV Levels of Evidence with APA reference citation. Identify the level of evidence of each article after the reference citation that goes at the end of this Assignment submission.

Introduction, Problem Statement, Purpose Statement, and Significance of your Mini-Research Proposal. Your
problem statement provides an overview of your Mini-Research Proposal topic and a clear statement of the need for this Mini-Research Proposal topic. The 5 articles that you have selected should provide rationale for the need for this Mini-Research Proposal. Your
purpose statement justifies the need for your Mini-Research Proposal and is supported in the literature. The
significance of your Mini-Research Proposal is clearly stated and supported by the literature. The
research question is clearly presented. Your selected
theory may be based on pathophysiology, a nurse theory, or from any health-related discipline.

Note: Your Step 1 of the Mini-Research Proposal should have an introduction and summary of what you have written.

Grading: Each part of your Mini-Research Proposal has a grading rubric. All submissions should have a title page and reference page. Each Section of the Mini-Research Proposal will then be added together the Week 5 assignment, which will be graded again with a new rubric that includes your best revision based on detailed weekly instructor feedback. Points will be lost if suggestions are not incorporated into the final Week 5 Submission of your Mini-Research Proposal. (See Week 5 Assignment rubric).

image1.png

image2.jpeg

ASSESSING NEUROLOGICAL SYMPTOMS

 

A 40 year old female presents with complaint of a headache for one week. Reports a “head cold” 3 weeks ago.  Thought it was getting better, but sinus symptoms are back and even worse.

Describes the headache is located across her forehead; feels like pressure behind my eyes and unable to breathe out of nose. Also feels mucus running down the back of throat.  Pain sometimes severe (8/10) but with acetaminophen reduces to moderate (4/10) and occasionally mild (2/10).  Occasional nonproductive cough.  Feels feverish at times; noted frequent sneezing and no appetite. Bending over seems to make the headache worse.  “Acetaminophen improves my headache, but doesn’t take it away.” Taking Sudafed HCL 120 mg every 12 hours, with some relief. Symptoms are worse in the morning – awakes with a headache. Ranges from 2/10 at its best to 8/10. Difficulty with concentrating at job and feels very tired.

Nursing week 5 abstract assignment

Week 5 Abstract, Significance, and Summary

 This week, you will submit the final portions of your paper for review. Please make sure to review all of your instructor's feedback and prepare your research for final submission in week 7.  

Abstract

The abstract is generally used as a searchable, comprehensive overview of your research. When online databases search research, they pull keywords from the abstract. Compose the abstract for your research project. Your abstract should be one page in length, and include the following:

· Describe the research problem and why it is important. 

· Identify the purpose of the study. 

· State the theoretical foundations and/or conceptual frameworks, as appropriate. 

· Summarize the key research question(s). 

· Describe, concisely, the overall research design, methods, and data analysis procedures. 

· Conclude with a statement on the implications for positive social or institutional change.

Your abstract must be a clear and concise overview of your research that would be easily searchable if you were to publish in a journal. 

Significance and Summary 

In 3–4 pages, summarize your study. Provide a summation of evidence (referencing your literature) that the problem is current, relevant, and significant to the discipline. Reiterate the gap in the literature and how your project contributes to social or organizational change in nursing and nursing education.

Within your summary, state the significance of your research by identifying potential contributions of the study that advance knowledge in the discipline. This is an elaboration of what the problem addresses. Provide a strong “take home” message that captures the key essence of your research.

Lastly, describe recommendations for further research that are grounded in the strengths and limitations of the current research as well as the literature you reviewed. Ensure recommendations do not exceed the research boundaries.

Review the rubric for grading criteria.

Points Possible: 50

NURS_692B_DE – NURS 692-B Week 5 Abstract, Significance and Summary Rubric

NURS_692B_DE – NURS 692-B Week 5 Abstract, Significance and Summary Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Abstract

15 to >12.3 pts

Meets Expectations

The abstract is one page in length and describes the research problem and it's importance. Expertly identifies the purpose of the study, the theoretical foundations and/or conceptual frameworks, as appropriate, summarizes the key research question(s) and describes, concisely, the overall research design, methods, and data analysis procedures. The abstract is concluded with a statement on the implications for positive social or institutional change.

12.3 to >11.25 pts

Approaches Expectations

The abstract is one page in length and meets most of the abstract criteria however may be limited in one area or missing key components that deter the abstract from it's intention.

11.25 to >8.85 pts

Falls Below Expectations

The abstract is significantly less than one page in length or it is too long and does not meet most of the abstract criteria. There are significant missing key components that deter the abstract from it's intention.

8.85 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

The abstract is not present or is grossly erroneous.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Significance and Summary

25 to >20.5 pts

Meets Expectations

The significance and summary section includes an overall summary of the project’s main points the significance of the project to the nursing education profession, and recommendations for future research.The summation is 3-4 pages and provides evidence that the problem is current, relevant, and significant to the discipline. The summary reiterates the gap in the literature and how your project contributes to social or organizational change in nursing and nursing education. The significance of the problem is stated and correlated to potential contributions of the study that advance knowledge in the discipline. Provides a strong “take home” message that captures the key essence of your research. The summary concludes with recommendations for further research that are grounded in the strengths and limitations of the current research as well as the literature reviewed.

20.5 to >18.75 pts

Approaches Expectations

The significance and summary section includes an overall summary of the project’s main points the significance of the project to the nursing education profession, however may be limited in detail in some areas. The summation is less than 3 pages and provides some evidence that the problem is current, relevant but the significance to the discipline is questionable. There is not a strong strong “take home” message that captures the key essence of your research.There are limited recommendations for further research that are somewhat grounded in the strengths and limitations of the current research as well as the literature reviewed.

18.75 to >14.75 pts

Falls Below Expectations

The significance and summary section includes an overall summary of the project’s main points but is missing key required components, enough that the meaning of this final section is impeded and does not summarize the research effectively.

14.75 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

The significance and summary section is not included or is severely limited in detail, in so much that it does not contribute to the research paper at all.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Mechanics

7.5 to >6.15 pts

Meets Expectations

Information is well organized and clearly communicated. Assignment is free of spelling and grammatical errors.

6.15 to >5.63 pts

Approaches Expectations

Answers are well written or orally presented throughout, and the information is reasonably organized and communicated. Assignment is mostly free of spelling and grammatical errors.

5.63 to >4.43 pts

Falls Below Expectations

Answers are somewhat organized and lacks some clarity. Contains some spelling and grammatical errors.

4.43 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Answers are not well written or orally presented and lack clarity. Information is poorly organized. Assignment contains many spelling and grammatical errors.

7.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA Format

2.5 to >2.05 pts

Meets Expectations

Follows all the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout.

2.05 to >1.88 pts

Approaches Expectations

Follows length requirement and most of the requirements related to format, source citations, and layout.

1.88 to >1.48 pts

Falls Below Expectations

Follows most of the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout.

1.48 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Does not follow format, length, source citations, and layout requirements.

2.5 pts

Total Points: 50