discussion

Post + 2 replies 

In this module, you begin laying the foundation for your academic and professional success. Your efforts begin with a vision that includes your own definition of success. Your vision may vary from those of your colleagues, but this does not mean you have to take these first steps alone.

Walden University and the College of Nursing also have a vision and mission, which include helping you to make your own vision a reality. Members of your new academic community, such as faculty, support teams, and fellow students, can also be helpful. Current practitioners and other member of the professional community can also help you to clarify your vision.

This Module’s Discussion asks you to consider how the Walden mission and vision as well as the College of Nursing’s mission and vision apply to your professional and academic goals. You will also begin to identify individuals and teams who can help you along the way as you begin designing the “blueprint”—your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan—that will guide you toward your own vision for academic and professional success. Finally, you will explain the importance of networking and how it can help you achieve your professional and academic goals.

week 5

see attachment 

k

For this assignment you will be asked to apply course concepts and learn to develop one Literature Review Table that includes 2 articles.

Please use the Literature Review Template provided within the course content and the evidence rating scale adapted from Melnyk found in course content. There is a video explaining how to complete the table in your course content.

Will I be adding this assignment to the final paper? Yes! The completed Literature Review Table from this week will be used again in the Appendix of your research paper (future assignment).

Will I need to create new literature review tables again for the final paper? No-this is the only assignment you’ll use the table format for. You will summarize 5 additional research articles in the Findings section of your Research Review, so please save those for the future.

Key Information for this assignment:

· You should not copy information from the research you obtain. All information from the research should be paraphrased in your own words (less than 6 words in one sentence should match). Plagiarism checkers should result in less than 10% for the literature review tables.

· All Searches for your Research Review must be completed through the Minnesota State University, Mankato library. Online searches will not be accepted with the exception of Google Scholar. Supply a pdf of your 2 full text articles in the drobox with your literature review table. Do not send links.

· A Data Search Table must be submitted with the Literature Review Assignment and is worth 5 points. Please provide a screen shot of one of your key term searches within the library databases.

Criteria

Possible Points

Points Earned

Clarification/Instructions

Article title, author, and date is listed in APA format and is current (not older than 5 years)

2

List the reference as a citation in the text would be cited. Include the reference in the reference section of the paper.

Purpose of article is clear and paraphrased from the article

2

Why was the research conducted? What was the goal /discovery that researcher was trying to achieve

Sample size of study article used is stated and numeric values are given (when applicable)

2

N=total number

n=subset

Study Design is clearly stated, and level of evidence is provided correctly (Evidence Rating Pyramid adapted from Melnyk in course content)

Strongest, stronger, strong, moderate, weak, weakest

5

Include design Quantitative, qualitative design, meta-analysis: retrospective chart review, surveys, etc.

Where does this fall Evidence pyramid Melnyk?

Variables/measurement included briefly; reliability of measurement data is included

4

Statistical test used for quantitative; qualitative may use pain score, survey, depression rating scale etc.

Results/findings are clear and statistical significance is included (for example p value)

5

Findings should have an associated statistical value if quantitative, if qualitative may have results of response to treatment 26 had pain relieved vs 13 did not….

Implications of research for nursing practice and how they apply to or support your research topic

Should include limitations

3

Did this article support your PICO? Did it lead you to search in a different direction? Does it demonstrate that there is not enough research to support a practice change

Correct APA format, free of spelling and grammatical errors

2

Follow APA for listing authors Page 286 7th ed.

Includes Data Search Table completed with search terms and screen shot of one search from table

5

Total

30

Ssdcsd

  • Explain how research has evolved since the Florence Nightingale era.
  • Discuss how research and EBP are different; include how you believe research supports EBP for nursing.
  • Describe one past/historical unethical breach of research conduct; then, share how you would ensure care of a study participant using one ethical or legal research consideration (guideline/principle).

Advocacy Action Plan Part 2: PEST Analysis

KINE 4354 Public Health Advocacy and Leadership

Assignment 4.1: Advocacy Action Plan Part 2: PEST Analysis

Adapted from:

Sample Templates
,

MindTools PEST Analysis Worksheet
, and

University of Bridgeport Career Development Timeline

Instructions

Use the template below as a worksheet/workspace. The question prompts provided are intended to help you to gain a better understanding of the public health issue or need associated with your advocacy action plan. As you complete this template, you are allowed to make informal notes, use bullet points and copy and past links to websites, articles and other resources that will help you to better identify factors related to your advocacy action plan.

As you complete this template, please keep in mind the following:

· Although it is important to consider macro-level factors (i.e., what is happening at the societal level), for the purposes of this assignment you are asked to place more emphasis on micro-level factors (i.e., what is happening at the community level).

· Although all questions may not apply to your advocacy action plan, be sure to answer each question under all four categories (Political, Economic, Socio-Cultural, & Technology).

Template Components

Step 1: Identify the
Political, Economic, Socio-Cultural and Technological Aspects of the Proposed Change in Your Advocacy Action Plan

KINE 4354 Assignment 4.1: Advocacy Action Plan Part II: PEST Analysis

Factor

Opportunity

Threat

POLITICAL

Political factors to consider:

·
When is the country's next local, state, or national election? How could this change government or regional policy?

·
Who are the most likely contenders for power in your community? What are their views on public health policy, and on other policies that affect your organization?

·
Depending on the country, how well developed are property rights and the rule of law, and how widespread are corruption and organized crime?

·
How are these situations likely to change, and how is this likely to affect you?

·
Could any pending legislation or taxation changes affect your business, either positively or negatively?

·
How does government approach public health policy, areas of social justice or social responsibility, and environmental protection legislation? What impact does this have, and is it likely to change?

·
Are there any other political factors that are likely to change?

Factor

Opportunity

Threat

ECONOMIC

Economic factors to consider:

·
How stable is the current economy? Is it growing, stagnating, or declining?

·
What is the financial condition of the organization you plan to work with? Is the organization financially stable? Is there revenue to fund your idea? If not, how will you address this?

·
Are there any other economic factors that you should consider?

Factor

Opportunity

Threat

SOCIO-CULTURAL

Socio-Cultural factors to consider:

·
What is your target population's growth rate and age profile? How is this likely to change?

·
Are generational shifts in attitude likely to affect what you're doing?

·
What are your target population’s levels of health, education, and social mobility? How are these changing, and what impact does this have?

·
What social attitudes and social taboos could affect your advocacy action plan? Have there been recent socio-cultural changes that might affect this?

·
How do religious beliefs and lifestyle choices affect the population?

·
Are any other socio-cultural factors likely to drive change for your proposed advocacy action plan?

Factor

Opportunity

Threat

TECHNOLOGICAL

Technological factors to consider:

·
Are there any new technologies that you could be using?

·
In which areas do governments and educational institutions focus their research? Is there anything you can do to take advantage of this to address your proposed advocacy action plan?

·
Are there existing technological hubs that you could work with or learn from? THINK COLLABORATION!

·
Are there any other technological factors that you should consider?

Step 2: BRAINSTORM OPPORTUNITIES

Now that you have identified some of the changes that are taking place in the proposed setting for your advocacy action plan, look at each of those changes and brainstorm the potential OPPORTUNITIES that might be available for you or for the organization which you are proposing the advocacy effort for.

Potential Opportunities for Your Advocacy Action Plan

1.

2.

3.

Step 3: BRAINSTORM THREATS

Now think about the changes and think about how some of those might be barriers to the implementation of your advocacy action plan. How might you plan in a manner that the potential threats might be minimized, or avoided?

Potential Threats for Your Advocacy Action Plan

1.

2.

3.

Step 4: Notes for TAKING ACTION

Now it is time to TAKE ACTION! You will take this next step in Assignment 6.1 as you write up your final plan. Use the section below to write your main takeaways as you start to develop the main sections of your advocacy action plan.

My Advocacy Action Plan Notes:

Quadruple AIm

 

Healthcare organizations continually seek to optimize healthcare performance. For years, this approach was a three-pronged one known as the Triple Aim, with efforts focused on improved population health, enhanced patient experience, and lower healthcare costs.

More recently, this approach has evolved to a Quadruple Aim by including a focus on improving the work life of healthcare providers. Each of these measures are impacted by decisions made at the organizational level, and organizations have increasingly turned to EBP to inform and justify these decisions.

 

  • Reflect on how EBP might impact (or not impact) the Quadruple Aim in healthcare.
  • Consider the impact that EBP may have on factors impacting these quadruple aim elements, such as preventable medical errors or healthcare delivery.

To Complete:

Write a brief analysis (no longer than 2 pages) of the connection between EBP and the Quadruple Aim.

Your analysis should address how EBP might (or might not) help reach the Quadruple Aim, including each of the four measures of:

  • Patient experience
  • Population health
  • Costs
  • Work life of healthcare providers

 References include:

unit 1 dq

see attached

Nutrition & Hydration


Nutrition & Hydration/Persistent Vegetative State (PVS)

After studying the course materials located on 

Module 7: Lecture Materials & Resources
 page, answer the following:

1. Cure / care: compare and contrast.

2. Basic care: Nutrition, hydration, shelter, human interaction.

· Are we morally obliged to this? Why? Example

3. Swallow test, describe; when is it indicated?

4. When is medically assisted N/H indicated?

· Briefly describe Enteral Nutrition (EN), including:

· NJ tube

· NG tube

· PEG

· Briefly describe Parenteral Nutrition (PN), including:

· a. Total parenteral nutrition

· b. Partial parenteral nutrition

5. Bioethical analysis of N/H; state the basic principle and briefly describe the two exceptions.

6. Case Study: Terry Schiavo (EXCEL FILE on 

Module 7: Lecture Materials & Resources
 page). Provide a bioethical analysis of her case; should we continue with the PEG or not? Why yes or why not?

7. Read and summarize ERD paragraphs #:  32, 33, 34, 56, 57, 58.

PN1

20231011_093053.jpg

20231011_093148.jpg

20231011_093159.jpg

20231011_093136.jpg

Case Study #1

 A 72-year-old woman presents to her regular primary care physician (PCP) with a 2-day history of fatigue, malaise