what are the effects of some of the nurse retention methods adopted on the reduction of nurse turnover in the in-hospital nurses’ facilities?

Nursing Project

 

 

 

Student’s Name

Department, Institutional Affiliation

Course Title

Tutor’s Name

Date

 

Background and the Significance

The nurse turnover is undergoing rapid growth as a human resource issue affecting the healthcare sector in the entire world. The rate of nurse intervention is considered to be higher with a range of 15 to 44 percent. The management of the nurse turnover is an important aspect in the successful delivery of healthcare services to the patients. However, the poor management of the high nurse turnover is affecting the quality of service delivery in healthcare institutions. The high nurse turnover is also having a considerable effect on the overall national healthcare system performance. Nurse turnover is leading to the disruption in the operations of service operations to different degrees ranging from the fairly disruptive to very disruptive (Dewanto & Wardhani, 2018).

Based on the adverse outcomes associated with nurse turnover, there is an opportunity to address the issues that leads to nurse turnover. The managers of healthcare facilities need to ensure that focus is put on the approaches and maximize solutions concerning the causes of nurse turnover. The approaches include the prevention of resignation as a result of the new job offers, ensure that there is an existence of conducive working conditions, make sure that the unmet expectations of the new nurses are addressed, and maximization of the selection process to help in understanding the perspective of the new nurse’s expectations (Halter et al., 2017).

Statement of the problem and the purpose of the study

Nurse turnover is a major healthcare concern that affects the quality of healthcare services. It leads to a low nurse-patient ratio as a result of few nurses caring for the patients. It leads to an increase in medication errors and preventable hospital-acquired infections. This is associated with work overload which makes it hard for the nurses to adhere to other safety measures like those aimed at preventing patient falls when they are overwhelmed with the responsibilities. The purpose of the paper is therefore to determine how the methods used in the nursing staff retention are impacting the retention of the new nurses (Kurnat-Thoma et al., 2017).

Research Question

The study is guided by the research question that is based on the PICOT question that is looking at how the staff retention methods within the in-hospital nurses are implemented by the management to address the issue of retention as compared to no intervention. Therefore, the possible research question for this paper is: what are the effects of some of the nurse retention methods adopted on the reduction of nurse turnover in the in-hospital nurses’ facilities?

Research or Null Hypothesis

The study is based on the research hypothesis that staff retention methods help address the issue of nurse turnover. The null hypothesis is that nursing staff retention methods do not help address the issue of nurse turnover in healthcare facilities.

Identification and definition of the variables

The variables in this study are both dependent and independent. The dependent variable is the nurse turnover while the independent variable is the nurse retention methods being adopted and they include reduction of the overtime; elimination of the mandatory overtime; development of a shared governance program with the nurses for example having a sat on the work schedule, improvement in the workflow, and healthcare policy; and recruitment of more nursing staff and the acuity-based staffing tools.

Operationalization of the variables

The dependent variable is impacted by the independent variable. The process of addressing the nurse turnover is depending on the nurse retention approach that is adopted by the management of the healthcare facility. The success of handling the issue of nurse turnover depends on how the management is implementing the nurse retention approaches.

Dependent Variable Independent variables

 

 

 

 

Nurse Retention

· Reduction of the overtime

· Elimination of the mandatory overtime

· Development of a shared governance program

· Improvement in the workflow

· healthcare policy

· Recruitment of more nursing staff

 

 

Nurse Turnover

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

Dewanto, A., & Wardhani, V. (2018). Nurse turnover and perceived causes and consequences: a preliminary study at private hospitals in Indonesia. BMC nursing17(2), 1-7 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-018-0317-8

Halter, M., Pelone, F., Boiko, O., Beighton, C., Harris, R., Gale, J., … & Drennan, V. (2017). Interventions to reduce adult nursing turnover: a systematic review of systematic reviews. The open nursing journal, 11, 108.

Kurnat-Thoma, E., Ganger, M., Peterson, K., & Channell, L. (2017). Reducing annual hospital and registered nurse staff turnover—A 10-element onboarding program intervention. SAGE Open Nursing, 3, 2377960817697712

Describe 1–2 legislative and/or advocacy activities in which your state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved.

Assignment 2: National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties (NONPF) Competencies

nine broad areas of core competence that apply to all nurse practitioners, regardless of specialty or patient population focus. NONPF created the first set of Nurse Practitioner Competencies in 1990; the most recent updates were incorporated in 2017. This course was designed to prepare you to synthesize knowledge gained throughout the program and to apply each of the nine core competencies within your selected areas of practice and your representative communities.

The nine areas of competency are:

  • Scientific Foundations
  • Leadership
  • Quality
  • Practice Inquiry
  • Technology and Information Literacy
  • Policy
  • Health Delivery System
  • Ethics
  • Independent Practice
To Prepare
  • Review this week’s Learning Resources, focusing on the NONPF Core Competencies Content.
The Assignment

For each of the nine NONPF competencies, write one paragraph explaining how the program has prepared you to meet the competency (for a total of at least nine paragraphs). Then, propose how you plan to engage in social change in your community as a nurse practitioner. Finally, describe 1–2 legislative and/or advocacy activities in which your state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved. Be specific and provide examples.

Was treatment fidelity for the intervention ensured?  Why or why not?

READ the article and answer the following question

 

Carefully read, summarize, and appraise your group’s assigned article.  The discussion board for this week should cover the following concepts in order to have a complete draft by the end of the week. Apply the concepts discussed in the lecture and the readings.  As you provide input to your peers, be sure to state a rationale for your claims.

1. Identify and discuss the following:

· dependent variable(s) and the instrument(s) used to measure them.

· how the data for the dependent variable(s) were collected.

· the intervention and procedures for delivering it.

· the key results for the study, including any p-values, reported.

· the conclusions the researchers drew.

2. Appraise and debate the quality of the data collection methods and determine whether the conclusions of the study were supported by the statistical results.  Consider the following questions:

· Were the measurement instruments reliable and valid?  Why or why not?

· Was treatment fidelity for the intervention ensured?  Why or why not?

· Were the conclusions of the study were supported by the statistical results, as indicated by the variable values and the p-values if reported?

Explain the degree to which you achieved each during the practicum experience.

Critical reflection on your growth and development during your practicum experience in a clinical setting helps you identify opportunities for improvement in your clinical skills, while also recognizing your strengths and successes.

Use this Journal to reflect on your clinical strengths and opportunities for improvement, the progress you made, and what insights you will carry forward into your next practicum.

To Prepare
  • Refer to the “Population-Focused Nurse Practitioner Competencies” in the Learning Resources, and consider the quality measures or indicators advanced practice nurses must possess in your specialty.
  • Refer to your “Clinical Skills Self-Assessment Form” you submitted in Week 1 and consider your strengths and opportunities for improvement.
  • Refer to your Patient Log in Meditrek; consider the patient activities you have experienced in your practicum experience and reflect on your observations and experiences.

In 450–500 words, address the following:

Learning From Experiences

  • Revisit the goals and objectives from your Practicum Experience Plan. Explain the degree to which you achieved each during the practicum experience.
  • Reflect on the 3 most challenging patients you encountered during the practicum experience. What was most challenging about each?
  • What did you learn from this experience?
  • What resources were available?
  • What evidence-based practice did you use for the patients?
  • What would you do differently?
  • How are you managing patient flow and volume?  How can you apply your growing skillset to be a social change agent within your community?

Communicating and Feedback

  • Reflect on how you might improve your skills and knowledge and how to communicate those efforts to your Preceptor.
  • Answer these questions: How am I doing? What is missing?
  • Reflect on the formal and informal feedback you received from your Preceptor.

How will the tool be validated (was it validated by a previous study or will expert consultation be sought through stakeholders and the project team)?

DNP Project II: Section II Proposal

Completion of this assignment will result in a contribution to the final DNP project proposal. During designated weeks, sections of the project will be submitted in their final form. The student will receive feedback up to a total of 2 times for each section prior to final submission of that section. If the submitted work does not require further revision after the first or second submission, these attempts will be graded, respectively. On the third submission of each section, it will be considered a final submission and will be graded accordingly based on the following rubric. In order to progress to DNP Project II, the academic mentor and course instructor must approve the final submission of the DNP project proposal at the end of the term, and the student must achieve a passing grade (minimum 83%) in DNP Project I.

Criterion Excellent (100-93%)

Proficient (92-87%)

Meets Standards (86-83%)

Needs Improvement (82-75%)

Unsatisfactory (75% or less)

Interventions (80 points)

Description includes planned interventions in sufficient detail that it could be reproduced. Plan for interventions discussed are realistic with consideration to the timeline of the project. (The full timeline doesn’t need to be included in the paper but your general plan for intervention should be.)

Interventions are developed at a proficient level but content development requires further revision to meet excellent standards.

Description of interventions meets minimum passing standards but requires further revision in a few areas to meet excellent standards.

Interventions need improvement and requires further revision in most areas.

The interventions are poorly developed or not developed at all.

 

 

Tools (80 points)

Discussion includes

tools that will be

necessary for

achieving project

objectives and

carrying out

interventions of the

QI project.

The following

information is

included in detail:

• Who will develop the tool (will an existing/establish ed tool or develop your own)?

• 2) How will the tool be validated (was it validated by a previous study or will expert consultation be sought through stakeholders and the project team)?

The project tools are discussed at a proficient level but content development requires further revision to meet excellent standards.

Discussion of project tools meets minimum passing standards but requires further revision in a few areas to meet excellent standards.

Development of project tools needs improvement and requires further revision in most areas.

Poorly developed project tools or not developed at all.

 

 

• 3) If using an established tool, does the author of the tool require the project lead to seek permission to use the tool? From who?

 

Appendices (80 points)

All tools are

completed and placed

in the appendices of

the paper.

Any appendices

requested by the

project team are

appropriately placed

in the paper.

Appendices are listed

in the order they

appear in your paper.

 

The appendices are nearly completed at a proficient level but minimal content needs to be added to meet excellent standards.

The appendices meet minimum passing standards but a moderate amount of content is required to meet excellent standards

The appendices section needs improvement and requires a large amount of content to be added.

The appendices section is poorly developed or not developed at all

Organization (20 points)

Concise and well-

organized writing.

Ideas are described

clearly and are

Clear organization of

main points.

Ideas are described

clearly and are

Clear organization of

main points but some

areas may stray from

logical sequence.

Writing lacks logical

organization.

Poorly organized,

ideas are not

developed adequately

Does not meet basic writing standards of organization.

 

 

presented in a logical

sequence.

 

Ideas and arguments

are fully supported

and developed

through evidence.

 

Headings are used

appropriately to

indicate new content

areas.

 

 

 

presented in a logical

sequence.

 

Support and

development of ideas

is present but one or

more areas lack

evidence.

 

Headings are used

appropriately to

indicate new content

areas.

Paragraph structure

is appropriate with

logical transitions.

 

 

 

Support of ideas

present but is not

consistent.

 

 

Use of headings is not

consistent.

 

Minimal paragraph

structure issues.

in the paper and lack

unity.

 

Paragraphs headings

are not used

appropriately.

Major paragraph

structure issues.

 

 

Writing Style (30 points)

Sentence structure

clear, with smooth

transitions, correct

grammar and

punctuation. No

spelling errors. Uses

standard English

language.

Overall sentence

structure is clear,

with smooth

transitions

Less than 3 grammar,

punctuation or

spelling errors.

Overall sentence

structure is clear, with

smooth transitions

Less than 5 grammar,

punctuation or

spelling errors.

 

Spelling, punctuation,

and grammatical

errors create

distraction, making

reading difficult;

fragments, comma

splices, run-ons

Writing style does not meet basic standards for English language.

 

 

 

Word choice is

correct, precise and

unambiguous.

 

Introduction has a

clear statement

addressing the topic.

 

Body paragraphs have

topic sentences that

are logical and fully

developed.

Paragraph structure is

appropriate with

logical transitions.

 

Writing does not

reveal discriminatory

bias.

 

Unity of the paper

clearly leads the

reader to the

 

Introduction has a

clear statement

addressing the topic.

 

Body paragraphs

have topic sentences

that are logical and

fully developed.

Paragraph structure

is appropriate with

logical transitions.

 

Writing does not

reveal discriminatory

bias.

 

 

Unity of the paper

clearly leads the

reader to the

conclusion.

 

Introduction has a

clear statement

addressing the topic.

 

Minimal paragraph

structure issues.

Transitions evident

but not used

throughout

 

 

 

Writing does not

reveal discriminatory

bias.

 

 

evident. Errors are

frequent.

 

 

 

Clear bias is evident.

 

 

Ideas lack unity

 

 

 

 

conclusion and stirs

thought regarding the

topic.

APA (35 points)

References are

current and are cited

appropriately

throughout paper.

Paper is formatted

per APA style guide

with no APA errors.

 

References are

current and are cited

appropriately

throughout paper.

Paper is formatted

per APA style guide

with less than 3 APA

errors.

 

 

References are

current and are cited

appropriately

throughout paper.

Paper is formatted per

APA style guide with

less than 5 APA errors.

 

References are not

current and/ or are

not appropriately

cited.

 

Paper is not

consistent with APA

formatting guide.

There is evidence of

plagiarism.

 

APA standards grossly not met.

Total points 325

Write a 150-250 word summary explaining which category your topic and intervention are under (community or leadership).

In collaboration with the approved course preceptor, students will identify a specific evidence-based topic for the capstone project change proposal. Write a 150-250 word summary explaining which category your topic and intervention are under (community or leadership).

In one to two paragraphs, accurately describe the issues raised, provide a clear position in favor of or opposed to, and offer specific examples of your concerns.

olicy Brief and Advocacy Letter Assignment

Building on the topic the student used for the first assignment, this assignment will require the student to write a one-page policy brief and advocacy letter to be sent to their legislator. This assignment will be worth 40% of the cumulative grade.

policy brief is used to convince the target audience of the urgency of the current problem or policy concern and present the need to adopt the preferred alternative or course of action outlined. It is commonly produced in response to a request directly from a decision-maker (legislator) or within an organization that intends to advocate for the position detailed in the brief.

Efficient policy briefs include several common features. Those features include:

  • The brief is focused. All aspects discussed are focused on achieving the intended audience to take the requested action.
  • The brief is professional and not academic. The usual audience is not interested in research or analysis conducted to produce the evidence. Rather they are interested in knowing the writer’s perspective on the problem and potential solutions, based on NEW and convincing evidence.
  • The brief should be evidence-based. The policy brief serves as a communication tool produced by someone with a vested interest in the policy (stakeholder), therefore the target audience will only be convinced by arguments that are supported by evidence.
  • The brief should also be concise. One page documents are the ones most likely to be read by busy lawmakers and their legislative teams.
    The format of the brief should be written as a one-page single spaced document. It does not need to include a title page, running header, or abstract. However, all references in-text and the reference list MUST be in APA format.
    The policy brief should include the following components:
  • An interesting title to attract the attention of the reader.
  • A clear and concise statement of the problem or issue.
  • A short overview of the root causes of the problem or issue.
  • One to two recommendations with a least two rationales with
    supporting evidence to validate the recommendations made. Evidence should come from scholarly journals, not textbooks or

NSG505AdvLetter.PolicyBrief

1

organization web sites. Three scholarly journal articles are required

to be used.
• Finally, the conclusion with a summary of the action the brief is

requesting.

An advocacy letter is a way to influence the ideas and views of legislators or decision makers within an organization. It allows the writer to maintain contact with the legislator or decision maker, to keep the issue high on the priority list when the writer cannot meet with them personally.

The format of the advocacy letter should be written in a standard letter format. Proper title and language should be used. It should not be more than two pages long, as to increase the chances that the letter will be read by the legislator, his or her staff or decision maker. Letters maybe mailed or sent electronically.

The advocacy letter should contain the following components:

  • Addressing the Letter – If the letter is concerning a Federal or State Bill or issue, it should be addressed to the Member of Congress or State Legislator who represents the student or if the issue is more local, it should be addressed to the decision makers who would be most concerned with the issue. Use the correct salutation.
  • Introduction – Introduce yourself and offer a concise statement about the reason for the advocacy letter. If discussing a specific legislative bill, include the bill number.
  • Health Policy Issue – In one to two paragraphs, accurately describe the issues raised, provide a clear position in favor of or opposed to, and offer specific examples of your concerns. Personal stories work well here.
  • Legislative or Advocacy Recommendations – Directly ask for the action you are requesting. State why your position is important to that person and the constituents he or she is associated with.
  • Closing – Develop a closing statement and provide your contact information for any follow-up questions or to act as a resource for further information.
    You can find examples of each of these in your book. Once your advocacy letter and policy brief has been reviewed by the faculty member, we encourage you to send it to the person whom your letter is addressed.

NSG505AdvLetter.PolicyBrief

Explain how you would disseminate the results of your project to an audience.

The collection of evidence is an activity that occurs with an endgame in mind. For example, law enforcement professionals collect evidence to support a decision to charge those accused of criminal activity. Similarly, evidence-based healthcare practitioners collect evidence to support decisions in pursuit of specific healthcare outcomes.

In this Assignment, you will identify an issue or opportunity for change within your healthcare organization and propose an idea for a change in practice supported by an EBP approach.

To Prepare:

  • Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you critically appraised in Module 4, related to your clinical topic of interest and PICOT.
  • Reflect on your current healthcare organization and think about potential opportunities for evidence-based change, using your topic of interest and PICOT as the basis for your reflection.
  • Consider the best method of disseminating the results of your presentation to an audience.

The Assignment: (Evidence-Based Project)

Part 4: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change

Create an 8- to 9-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:

  • Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its culture and readiness for change. (You may opt to keep various elements of this anonymous, such as your company name.)
  • Describe the current problem or opportunity for change. Include in this description the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in general.
  • Propose an evidence-based idea for a change in practice using an EBP approach to decision making. Note that you may find further research needs to be conducted if sufficient evidence is not discovered.
  • Describe your plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation.
  • Explain how you would disseminate the results of your project to an audience. Provide a rationale for why you selected this dissemination strategy.
  • Describe the measurable outcomes you hope to achieve with the implementation of this evidence-based change.
  • Be sure to provide APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer-reviewed articles you selected to support your thinking.
  • Add a lessons learned section that includes the following:
    • A summary of the critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed articles you previously submitted
    • An explanation about what you learned from completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template (1-3 slides)

Describe the current technology used to support patient safety.

Patient Safety and a Culture of Safety

A shift in paradigm is occurring across the United States from volume- to value-based care. Reflect upon your organizational culture to address the following.

  • Describe the culture of your organization (hospital) as it relates to patient safety.
  • Identify one opportunity to improve patient safety outcomes. Propose a strategy for the implementation of this improvement initiative.
  • Describe the current technology used to support patient safety. Identify the potential unintended consequences of this technology. Propose solutions to address these potential consequences.
  • Describe an incident in which patient safety was or had the potential to be compromised due to an emphasis on volume-based care.

 

Instructions:

Use an APA 7 style and a minimum of 200 words. Provide support from a minimum of at least three (3) scholarly sources. The scholarly source needs to be: 1) evidence-based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) Sources should be no more than five years old (published within the last 5 years), and 4) an in-text citation. citations and references are included when information is summarized/synthesized and/or direct quotes are used, in which APA style standards apply.

• Textbooks are not considered scholarly sources. 

• Wikipedia, Wikis, .com website or blogs should not be used.

What are the elements of a properly executed consent? 

What populations are considered vulnerable populations and why?
What are appropriate ways to recruit subjects?
How would you properly obtain consent?
What are the elements of a properly executed consent?